As a Parker fan, I'm wavering
Collapse
-
Agreed, they aren't always right and they likely didn't count the shots Parker was throwing when he had Hughie backed up against the ropes.Comment
-
Comment
-
Parker didn't jump out to me in the couple of fights I saw him. I might get jumped on for this but I see him as a Breazeale type fighter except with probably a better chin. Breazeale was way bigger and Joshua handled him pretty well.Comment
-
Hughie barely landed a jab the whole fight.
Flicks that barely reach your opponents gloves are not scoring jabs.Comment
-
Fair enough.Qualifying for the Olympics doesn't make a better professional fighter ask Audley Harrison, Mike Tyson lost to a guy in the amateurs, but when they met in the pro-ranks Tyson demolished him.
Then we have the whole AJ won a gold medal thing, yeah... he was gifted it, he didn't legitimately beat the guy he was in the final with he had a few very questionable decisions go his way.
This is the same **** they did with Wladimir, those are/were top guys at the time of Parker beating him, in short they're good wins no need to degrade that.
Joshua work-rate is considerably lower than Parkers, Parker was having a hard time against Takam due to the slickness and precision of Takams attacks plus Parker was throwing a lot and missing, it happens...
Considering Parker was also wanting to fight AJ when he wasn't the huge PPV star that he is currently, I'd say that's an unfair thing to say. Everyone in the HW division wants to fight AJ, everyone wants to get paid good obviously that will be a part of it.
I'm a Parker fan, just trying to be objective and make sure I'm being realistic.Comment
-
Nah, I definitely see him as better than Breazeale, Whyte etc. Just not sure he's legite top 5.
I guess we'll find out tomorrow.Comment
Comment