Comments Thread For: Golovkin's Promoter: If No Canelo, We Need Good Foe For May 5

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • GhostofDempsey
    Undisputed Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Mar 2017
    • 31333
    • 12,917
    • 8,587
    • 493,602

    #141
    Unless he plans on fighting a Mexican on May 5th, I don't see the significance of holding to that date.

    Comment

    • j.razor
      Undisputed Champion
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Jun 2007
      • 23786
      • 265
      • 0
      • 227,586,034

      #142
      Originally posted by rrayvez
      evidence #1 that you're a a low iq fan- you're someone who's arguing that ggg lost to jacobs and Canelo when the vast majority of the boxing world had him winning those fights. Ggg outlanded both of those guys significantly over the course of the fight and round by round. That just shows that you're either an idiot or biased. Evidence #2 that you don't know ****- you're saying Ggg struggled with brook but meanwhile he stopped him in 5 and broke his face. That wasn't a struggle. He showed some vulnerability to being hit but he wasn't in any danger at any point. Lastly, I just said I'd pick charlo to beat ggg but then you go and post that I'd be surprised if either charlo was competitive with ggg. There's Proof that you're borderline illiterate. See, you can't assess ggg objectively like I can because you're a Canelo nut guzzler. I can acknowledge GGG's positives and negatives like I acknowledge that ggg didn't want it with ward because ward would've washed him. I don't have to defend anything with ggg. Instate facts. You on the other hand attack ggg and make up nonsense because Canelo is impossible to defend between his corrupt scorecards, belt dropping ways, avoidance and now positive tests.
      Your 1st "evidence" is a 100% lie. Go make a video of all the punches that landed on NELO/lil g/Jacobs WITHOUT editing. A simple slow motion will do. I dare you.

      "That wasn't a struggle. He showed some vulnerability to being hit but"- Do you see how dumb you sound? You should of just added another but....LOL

      Originally Posted by Hnnnggg
      Proven against a one legged Heiland. His best win was over a diminished Austin Trout. I don’t think he’s a hypejob, just overrated. Could you honestly imagine Jermall taking Danny Jacobs, let alone GGG? You shouldn’t presume what real “boxing fans” want to see. #lionsonly lol

      Originally Posted by j.razor
      So golovkin fought 36 low level opponents in a row, his team turned down "S.O.G." then he lost to Jacobs & Nelo but you don't have him overrated? At least Jermall beat Trout while golovkin was struggling with a welterweight then loses 2 fights in a row...lol....Jermall/Jacobs would be a good fight & I won't be surprised if Jermall won. YOU would though.......

      And I wasn't talking about Jermall beating lil g cuz we all know that, even the lil g fans know....I was talking bout Jermall/Jacobs so I guess "There's Proof that you're borderline illiterate" LOL....plus I wasn't talking to you! So once again you are WRONG!....LMMFAO!

      Comment

      • rrayvez
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Sep 2008
        • 3769
        • 671
        • 53
        • 19,715

        #143
        Originally posted by j.razor
        Your 1st "evidence" is a 100% lie. Go make a video of all the punches that landed on NELO/lil g/Jacobs WITHOUT editing. A simple slow motion will do. I dare you.

        "That wasn't a struggle. He showed some vulnerability to being hit but"- Do you see how dumb you sound? You should of just added another but....LOL

        Originally Posted by Hnnnggg
        Proven against a one legged Heiland. His best win was over a diminished Austin Trout. I don’t think he’s a hypejob, just overrated. Could you honestly imagine Jermall taking Danny Jacobs, let alone GGG? You shouldn’t presume what real “boxing fans” want to see. #lionsonly lol

        Originally Posted by j.razor
        So golovkin fought 36 low level opponents in a row, his team turned down "S.O.G." then he lost to Jacobs & Nelo but you don't have him overrated? At least Jermall beat Trout while golovkin was struggling with a welterweight then loses 2 fights in a row...lol....Jermall/Jacobs would be a good fight & I won't be surprised if Jermall won. YOU would though.......

        And I wasn't talking about Jermall beating lil g cuz we all know that, even the lil g fans know....I was talking bout Jermall/Jacobs so I guess "There's Proof that you're borderline illiterate" LOL....plus I wasn't talking to you! So once again you are WRONG!....LMMFAO!
        the way you write makes no sense. You don't write proper sentences and have no knowledge of grammar. It's very easy not to comprehend your points but I will destroy the few things you said that do make sense. 1. Who the hell has time to watch fights in slow mo and count punches? Perhaps a ****** with no job like you but there's a thing called punch stats. You won't find anybody reputable saying ggg lost those 2 fights. 2. You have no idea what a struggle is in boxing. Ggg didn't struggle with brook. By your logic Canelo struggled with khan which is ******. Brook and khan vs ggg and Canelo were like 2 annoying flies that kept buzzing around but then got swatted. 3. Your argument about the charlos still doesn't make sense so I won't waste any time.

        Comment

        • j.razor
          Undisputed Champion
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Jun 2007
          • 23786
          • 265
          • 0
          • 227,586,034

          #144
          Originally posted by rrayvez
          the way you write makes no sense. You don't write proper sentences and have no knowledge of grammar. It's very easy not to comprehend your points but I will destroy the few things you said that do make sense. 1. Who the hell has time to watch fights in slow mo and count punches? Perhaps a ****** with no job like you but there's a thing called punch stats. You won't find anybody reputable saying ggg lost those 2 fights. 2. You have no idea what a struggle is in boxing. Ggg didn't struggle with brook. By your logic Canelo struggled with khan which is ******. Brook and khan vs ggg and Canelo were like 2 annoying flies that kept buzzing around but then got swatted. 3. Your argument about the charlos still doesn't make sense so I won't waste any time.
          We in class n bout 2 take a test or sumthin? Nah, you just struggling to make an argument....So you wouldn't want to prove me wrong by watching the fight again? So the answer is you know lil g didn't win. Jeff Mayweather said Nelo won easy & that he was the only one landing the clean punches. I have been in that ring & competed in the Diamond Gloves Tournament, 2nd place. If this was about fighting the best then lil g would fight Jermall in May since Jermall can pay Hugo step aside $ cuz its only 2weeks away & it fits PERFECT with the schedule.

          Comment

          • rrayvez
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Sep 2008
            • 3769
            • 671
            • 53
            • 19,715

            #145
            Originally posted by j.razor
            We in class n bout 2 take a test or sumthin? Nah, you just struggling to make an argument....So you wouldn't want to prove me wrong by watching the fight again? So the answer is you know lil g didn't win. Jeff Mayweather said Nelo won easy & that he was the only one landing the clean punches. I have been in that ring & competed in the Diamond Gloves Tournament, 2nd place. If this was about fighting the best then lil g would fight Jermall in May since Jermall can pay Hugo step aside $ cuz its only 2weeks away & it fits PERFECT with the schedule.
            so 1 guy, Jeff mayweather said Canelo won easy and that's what you're going on?? Gtfoh. There are about 100 other credible boxers, trainers, media, that all had ggg winning. The oercantage of people who thought ggg won is in the 90s. Only canelo d*ck riders think he won, nevertheless easy. I don't care that you participated in the pee wee tiger Shulman tournament. You don't know **** about boxing.

            Comment

            • j.razor
              Undisputed Champion
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Jun 2007
              • 23786
              • 265
              • 0
              • 227,586,034

              #146
              Originally posted by rrayvez
              so 1 guy, Jeff mayweather said Canelo won easy and that's what you're going on?? Gtfoh. There are about 100 other credible boxers, trainers, media, that all had ggg winning. The oercantage of people who thought ggg won is in the 90s. Only canelo d*ck riders think he won, nevertheless easy. I don't care that you participated in the pee wee tiger Shulman tournament. You don't know **** about boxing.
              I respect Nelo's skills in the ring but I'm not really a fan of his & if I had you in the ring you would say something completely different. Jeff knows boxing, I know boxing, you won't even watch the fight again to PROVE it & (in Roger's voice) "You Don't Know **** Bout Boxing!" LOL

              Comment

              Working...
              TOP