Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Does GGG Deserve to be P4P No.1?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by Thraxox View Post
    U talk about resume yet has Spence in the 4th and Crawford in the second.
    None of the guys in my top 5 have a great resume. Crawford and Mikey have a case. I don't see none of them beating Usyk, however, if they were the same weight.

    I base mine almost 80 percent on skill, maybe 20 for resume.

    GGG doesn't fit.

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by BoxingIsGreat View Post
      None of the guys in my top 5 have a great resume. Crawford and Mikey have a case. I don't see none of them beating Usyk, however, if they were the same weight.

      I base mine almost 80 percent on skill, maybe 20 for resume.

      GGG doesn't fit.
      Then Errol Spence doesn't fit either. As if he has the affirmed skills. Most of which it is because of him having a significant size disadvantage in fights.

      Comment


      • #33
        ive got im behind lomachenko in 2nd but theres a case to be made for him as number 1. boxing judging is corrupt that youve got to go on what you see and everyone saw hes a better fighter than canelo

        Comment

        Working...
        X
        TOP