Comments Thread For: NSAC On Golovkin's Claims: No Favoritism For Canelo in Vegas

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BIGPOPPAPUMP
    Franchise Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Sep 2003
    • 46539
    • 2,259
    • 334
    • 5,493,285

    #1

    Comments Thread For: NSAC On Golovkin's Claims: No Favoritism For Canelo in Vegas

    On Tuesday, middleweight champion Gennady Golovkin fired off an arsenal of verbal jabs in the direction of Canelo Alvarez, the Mexican superstar's promoter Oscar De La Hoya, and even the Nevada State Athletic Commission.
    [Click Here To Read More]
  • Beercules
    Lounge POTY '17
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Aug 2013
    • 65186
    • 4,940
    • 7,203
    • 950,179

    #2

    Comment

    • Golden Boi 360
      Boxing's Biggest Cash Cow
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • May 2010
      • 5724
      • 402
      • 318
      • 86,855

      #3
      Golovkin really compared judges to *********s? ******, lol.

      Comment

      • .!WAR MIKEY!.
        Banned
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Aug 2015
        • 23780
        • 889
        • 769
        • 309,182

        #4
        I believe it, I believe NSAC will be fair and rightfully see Canelo as a clean fighter.

        Canelo is a clean fighter, the wbc and the wba is looking at all the evidence and have concluded that they believe it is from mean contamination and nothing else, also the wada accredited doctor collaborated this by his statements on this matter (not this particular matter but this matter in general) and states levels as which canelo had "SHOULD BE CONSIDERED A NEGATIVE TEST".

        So their is no reason to think NSAC will rule against science and expert advice.

        WAR CANELO!

        Comment

        • kafkod
          I am Fanboy. Very Fanboy
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Sep 2013
          • 24818
          • 2,193
          • 1,810
          • 405,373

          #5
          Bwahahaha!!!

          Comment

          • steeve steel
            Undisputed Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Mar 2013
            • 5397
            • 1,543
            • 461
            • 32,314

            #6
            The plot thickens, as they say... "Canelo's Feb. 17 positive sample contained such a higher level than the positive sample collected on Feb. 20."

            Comment

            • Teetotaler
              Banned
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • May 2014
              • 8434
              • 274
              • 404
              • 18,146

              #7
              Favoritism is reserved for froid

              Comment

              • Shrap
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Nov 2015
                • 1568
                • 241
                • 52
                • 24,377

                #8
                No evidence of favourtism? Why was Adelaide Byrd suspended then?

                Comment

                • M Bison
                  Perfect, but you're not
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Mar 2012
                  • 15677
                  • 600
                  • 798
                  • 32,424

                  #9
                  Honestly, NSAC shouldn't say anything they're just making themselves look like idiots, we all know what is up.

                  Comment

                  • Boxing42
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Aug 2017
                    • 1893
                    • 78
                    • 245
                    • 13,707

                    #10
                    In other words stop crying like a bitch

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP