NSB Pick'em#11 Dillian Whyte vs Lucas Browne

[siablo14]

doesnt really bother me but i dont think fights like kelly v molina or price v povetkin are needed. 99 percent of people would pick kelly and povetkin and they arent big fights really. i think if theres a dearth of match ups then you could do them types of fight, but best to keep it to the bigger fights for the most part.

True. Parker-Joshua is okay by itself for this week.

[siablo14]

Hold on. But when did he delete the pick, before or after the fight?

Most likely after when he saw the result.

[john l]

Hold on. But when did he delete the pick, before or after the fight?

Well he already gave up that excuse because he just came on and said he did not vote.And I looked about 30 mins before fight so that would have been possible but why?And like I said he just boxed himself in by saying he never voted.

[*TonyMontana*]

Tricky

Nobody has proof robbie cheated but everybody agrees he did

He picked browne so for him to cheat he must have used a multiplier

Anybody caught cheating need to be disqualified

But there needs to be evidence

[siablo14]

Tricky

Nobody has proof robbie cheated but everybody agrees he did

He picked browne so for him to cheat he must have used a multiplier

Anybody caught cheating need to be disqualified

But there needs to be evidence

Technicians need to only allow them to delete their content but not the fact that they posted.

[Citizen Koba]

Technicians need to only allow them to delete their content but not the fact that they posted.

I was wondering about the post numbers. Posts following a deleted post should keep their original numbers I woulda thought, leaving a gap in the post numbering, although I could be wrong. I meant to experiment with it, but I've been putting my boy to bed. Is there any gaps in post numbering in the pick 'em thread?

Anyways. I do trust john in what he says, but I'm reluctant to take any action in the absence of proof - in fact even with proof I'd be reluctant to, that ain't really what this ish should be about - mainly it should be enough that a player is being watched and that he'd have lost the trust and respect of his fellows. A second attempt should probably result in a DQ though.

[john l]

I was wondering about the post numbers. Posts following a deleted post should keep their original numbers I woulda thought, leaving a gap in the post numbering, although I could be wrong. I meant to experiment with it, but I've been putting my boy to bed. Is there any gaps in post numbering in the pick 'em thread?

Anyways. I do trust john in what he says, but I'm reluctant to take any action in the absence of proof - in fact even with proof I'd be reluctant to, that ain't really what this ish should be about - mainly it should be enough that a player is being watched and that he'd have lost the trust and respect of his fellows. A second attempt should probably result in a DQ though.

There was no missed # of posts but I know he did and Drama show too.If no proof then fine but don't think you need to be caught cheating twice to get DQed imo.Once is enough in my book.I just hope everyone knows I would NEVER do this if I was not 1000% sure.I would never want someone to ?s my integrity.But I just know on this.

[Citizen Koba]

Tricky

Nobody has proof robbie cheated but everybody agrees he did

He picked browne so for him to cheat he must have used a multiplier

Anybody caught cheating need to be disqualified

But there needs to be evidence

Thing we got is that john doesn't think Robbie used a mult so it's hard to fathom why he'd delete... nonetheless we've got john who's dead sure and siablo and Drama saying he made a pick too. I'm very reluctant to take it any further without solid evidence, but it's probably one of those occasions where the will of the players should be heard.

[john l]

Thing we got is that john doesn't think Robbie used a mult so it's hard to fathom why he'd delete... nonetheless we've got john who's dead sure and siablo and Drama saying he made a pick too. I'm very reluctant to take it any further without solid evidence, but it's probably one of those occasions where the will of the players should be heard.

No he did not use a xs(which if I was out to get him I would say he used a x3)but it goes to show if he would cheat just to have a better % he would cheat at ANYTHING.But agree its hard to do something like a DQ(which I think you should get 1st time cheating)if we don't have proof or a couple more who remember idk its tough but in all honesty I would bet my life on it or would not have said anything.

[Citizen Koba]

There was no missed # of posts but I know he did and Drama show too.If no proof then fine but don't think you need to be caught cheating twice to get DQed imo.Once is enough in my book.I just hope everyone knows I would NEVER do this if I was not 1000% sure.I would never want someone to ?s my integrity.But I just know on this.

I get that, man, and it ain't about me doubting you - in fact I completely trust you here - but about not wanting to be seen to act without tangible evidence...

Like I say, I think the best course is to put it to a poll of the players