Tweet
Lomachenko is the best P4P Boxer in the World AINEC!
-
-
One result doesn't matter... a fighter's collective resume matters and Loma's resume even with 1 loss (which seems to only be a big deal to new boxing fans) is miles better than Garcia's. Names matter far more than numbers.So this doesnt matter, is that what youre saying? I get more credit for losing to Salido, but Garcia gets less credit for BEATING him. So Losing gets more credit than Winning? Loma could do what he required Rigo to do....go up two weight classes and fight Garcia, Garcia said he'd meet Loma at 135....NOT UNDERSTANDING YOUR ARGUMENT. One guy has 11 pro fights with a loss, the other has 30+ fights with no losses, belts in many weight classes, he beat someone Loma couldnt beat You still havent explained your reasoning..
Comment
-
WHAT? EXACTLY MAKES LOMA #1P4P: accomplishments, belts, his competition, like what? his power? most of you are just saying it because, but have provided NO kind of argument, and you guys overlook his loss. Will you overlook the NEXT guys loss, like you do for this boxer?
And if youre overlooking his loss to Salido then you should overlook Kovalevs loss to a #1 p4p boxer. Some of you guys are just saying loma but with nothing to back it up. His offense, his defense, his inside fighting, etc. NOTHING. (which leaves an obvious hole in your argument) And if you peruse these boards for anytime, you would have a strong argument for WHY.
IF HE IS AS GOOD AS YOU GUYS SAY....WASNT HE SUPPOSED TO BEAT SOMEONE FROM 2 WEIGHT CLASSES BELOW HIM....So youre saying he gets a pass because he was green.......Canelo gets a pass for losing to TBE, if that is you criteria. And he's faced better opposition. So should'nt HE be #1P4P. Using your guys argument....the criteria used to be selling 98k PPV's to book your trip to the hall, now those standards are lowered even more. You have to lose to Salido, beating Salido gets you nothing. Salido has 14 losses, so those 14 people.........
Comment
-
-
Lomo, for the obvious reason.Comment
-
Please for the love of god, SOMEONE give a reason that evenly applies to other boxers, namely Garcia. Because Crawford was at least a Unified Champion. Before Spence went to Brooks home and broke his face and took his belts, Brook was considered a good boxer. Loma has done nothing better than Crawford, Spence, or Garcia in the pro game. Loma has Russell, thats IT! And Russell might beat him in a rematch. Where would that put Russell if he defeats Loma in a rematch? Is he #1p4p if he beats Loma? since loma is held in such high regard? I bet not, because (alot of you know why) a guy with 11 fights is now considered to be #1P4P. That sh|ts on most boxers in the game to even think this, he lost to a guy who has 14LOSSES&4DRAWS........Canelo lost to someone who's record is 50-0 and Canelo has a far superior RESUME.....How does this SH|T add up?
I guess Tank is high up on your rankings.......
Comment
-
Damn it's funny watching supposed grown men froth at the mouth over other men's opinions of fighters. Good stuff, I hope you idiots never change.Comment
-
SH|T IS HILARIOUS, when FACTS make people so mad. But no one has yet to give an EXAMPLE of what makes Loma #1P4P. Look through all the posts and you'll not see 1 reason AS TO WHY. This is a boxing site/forum for people to discuss Professional Boxing, and no one can speak on IF IT is defense/offense, ring generalship, fighting at a certain distance, inside fighting, ANYTHING! Thats WHY THEY MAD
Comment
Comment