Comments Thread For: Magdaleno vs. Dogboe is Shifted To April 28 on ESPN

[kidbazooka]

And here I thought mexicans hated Trump, but apparently they are Trump supporters now according to you.


VIVA LA mEXICO!!!!!!

Naw just the trump supporters in the states.

There the ones shooting up all these schools.

['b']

Naw just the trump supporters in the states.

There the ones shooting up all these schools.

*they're

So your original comment backfired once I established if anyone was a *****phile, it would be the people from a nation that are very ANTI-Trump - NOT Trump supporters.

Secondly, you can't even spell kid, so now it seems that not only are you statistically more likely to be a *****phile than a Trump supporting American (if you are indeed from mexico / mexican heritage) but you also can't spell very good, I'd wager you have worse spelling than the majority of Trump supporters on here.

(FYI: I don't vote, don't care for politics -Hillary or Trump - ******** or **********)

[Bigpoppa13]

Dogboe can punch, i see him sending Magdaleno to the hospital!

dogpoop can also chuck a spear

[Bigpoppa13]

*they're

So your original comment backfired once I established if anyone was a *****phile, it would be the people from a nation that are very ANTI-Trump - NOT Trump supporters.

Secondly, you can't even spell kid, so now it seems that not only are you statistically more likely to be a *****phile than a Trump supporting American (if you are indeed from mexico / mexican heritage) but you also can't spell very good, I'd wager you have worse spelling than the majority of Trump supporters on here.

(FYI: I don't vote, don't care for politics -Hillary or Trump - ******** or **********)

We are talking about the president that said his daughter is hot

['b']

We are talking about the president that said his daughter is hot

No, we are talking about supporters of Trump (mostly from America) and people who are more likely to be anti-Trump (mexicans) who are statistically much more likely to be *****philes based off of the laws dealing with age of consent in mexico.

I didn't come out and start calling people *****philes for their political affiliation out of nowhere - he did...and I proved him wrong.

[kidbazooka]

No, we are talking about supporters of Trump (mostly from America) and people who are more likely to be anti-Trump (mexicans) who are statistically much more likely to be *****philes based off of the laws dealing with age of consent in mexico.

I didn't come out and start calling people *****philes for their political affiliation out of nowhere - he did...and I proved him wrong.

You didn’t prove shiiit except that your one of those trump supporters.

Oh yea keep worrying about my typos you fuucking losers go nuts over that.

Get a fuucking life.

And on a side note I’m American born and raised and generations deep but I’m no trump supporter no fuucking way.

['b']

The Mexican hate is in full effect

Don’t go shooting up schools now you trump supporters.

Fuucking pedophiles.

Also, are Trump supporters more or less likely to be ****sexuals? Pretty sure it is generally accepted that ****sexuals hate Trump and love ******* / left / 'progressive' parties.

****sexual men are 15x more likely to be *****philes than heterosexual men
We now do the maths on the following data.

1. 33.3% of the victims of *****philia are boys and 66.7% are girls.
2. 3% of the male population are ****sexual and 97% are heterosexual.
3. 98% of *****philes are male and 2% are female.

Since 98% of the perpetrators are male, at least 31.3% of all *****philia is male on male. So 3% of men (****sexuals) carry out 31.3% of the child abuse and 97% of men (heterosexuals) carry out 66.7% of the child abuse and women carry out 2% of it.

So the chances of a ****sexual male being an abuser are 31.3/3 times more than average, whereas the chances of a heterosexual male being an abuser are 66.7/97 times the average (i.e. less than the average).

So the chances of a heterosexual male being an abuser are 31.3/3 x 97/66.7 = 15.17 more than the chances of a heterosexual male being an abuser.

So if a boy child is placed in the care of two male ****sexual parents then his chances of being sexually abused are 30x greater than if he is fostered out to a heterosexual couple (since females hardly do any *****philia).

Now the ****sexual activists have come up with a paper thin deception to cover this up. They say that male *****philes are not ****sexuals, they are *****philes. And therefore there are in fact no ****sexual *****philes at all. This neatly exonerates them (if you fall for it) and condemns the next generation of boys to further abuse my reclassified ****sexuals.

Of course if you define a ****sexual as being a ****sexual who is not a *****phile, then no ****sexual will be a *****phile. But you could just as well define a politician as being a politician who is not a liar. Then all politicians would be honest. It is a really pathetic attempt to defend the indefensible. But people seem to swallow it. The proof that male-on-male *****philes are not just interested in children and are therefore ****sexual, is the work of Abel and Harlow quoted above who state that...

There's more information preceeding that with sources if you'd like me to post them.

MODS can delete the post if they want, I just thought I'd combat a pretty big lie with some truth

[Mexican_Puppet]

This is a greeeeat fight!

['b']

You didn’t prove shiiit except that your one of those trump supporters.

Oh yea keep worrying about my typos you fuucking losers go nuts over that.

Get a fuucking life.

And on a side note I’m American born and raised and generations deep but I’m no trump supporter no fuucking way.

Cool well my point still stands then! So that your tiny little boy brain can follow, I'll reduce it down step by step.

1.You called Trump supporters *****philes.

2. Trump supporters are mostly American.

3 The majority of mexicans are anti-Trump.

4. Mexico's age of consent laws allow adults to have sex with children that are 12 years old.

[kidbazooka]

Also, are Trump supporters more or less likely to be ****sexuals? Pretty sure it is generally accepted that ****sexuals hate Trump and love ******* / left / 'progressive' parties.

There's more information preceeding that with sources if you'd like me to post them.

MODS can delete the post if they want, I just thought I'd combat a pretty big lie with some truth

FYI I didn’t read none of that ***** you posted, all you’ve done is expose your self as one of those idiots who voted for that racist piece of shiiit.