As I explained, your premise is flawed. Your premise is that a casual like you should be able to tell, just from a video.
That would of course defeat the point, as previously explained, because if it was completely obvious to casual idiots like you, then they could not get away with it, thereby defeating the point. A boxer at 98% will not defeat a boxer at 100%.
If PEDs increase the boxers ability by 5% the 100% boxer would have been at 95, and thereby lost.
So again your premise is ****** and so are you.
Tell me, where did Pacquiao defeat your ped-enhanced boxer and how much did it hurt you?
That would of course defeat the point, as previously explained, because if it was completely obvious to casual idiots like you, then they could not get away with it, thereby defeating the point. A boxer at 98% will not defeat a boxer at 100%.
If PEDs increase the boxers ability by 5% the 100% boxer would have been at 95, and thereby lost.
So again your premise is ****** and so are you.
Tell me, where did Pacquiao defeat your ped-enhanced boxer and how much did it hurt you?
Comment