Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Kell Brook: I Would DESTROY Errol Spence in a Rematch!

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    As Spence tweeted, he needs a belt first for it to happen.

    Unlike the rest of the WW division, Brook didn't avoid Spence. Yes, Spence was his mandatory but he could of easily moved up to 154 after fighting GGG at 160.

    If Spence keeps getting avoided at 147 he will have to move up. I'd like to see him stick around and unify if possible. Then we might get a super fight v Thurman/Crawford.

    Comment


    • #12
      People act like Brook wasnt getting in Spence ass

      Comment


      • #13
        be alright a couple of fights down the line if brooks looking good at 154. not a fan of rematches in general, you get your one shot and if you blow it, tough ****. but people arent queuing up to fight spence and it was by far his most entertaining fight.

        Comment


        • #14
          Originally posted by G G G View Post
          Could be... I'm not sold on Error Spence.
          True, GGG gave the blueprint for everyone to see, Errol Spence regardless of how good a fighter he is he had a very very hard time-fighting Kell Brook unlike GGG.

          The rematch could prove a lot of people wrong, notice Kell isn't interested in fighting GGG again?
          You only would be interested in fighting a guy again after a loss If you know you could beat them, hence why guys like Floyd ducked the Pacquiao rematch, so sad!

          Comment


          • #15
            He will only destroy him if he avoids every punch. Not sure I want to see this savagery

            Comment


            • #16
              I mean, Brook seemed the better of the two tbh but it doesnt matter if your face doesnt hold up


              “He need some milk”

              Comment


              • #17
                Originally posted by bgdddy6333 View Post
                Why is the new school always talking about a rematch fights? I thought you fought rematch fights if it was a robbery or close fight. I thought that what made a champion great. Win the fight at all cost meaning may not be your night but you overcome, adversity or domination. These lose a fight that wasn't close and talking about rematch. I don't want see Thurman vs Porter, Thurman vs Garcia, or Spence vs Brooks. Brooks lost cause he couldn't take that pressure. Yes! He was winning but he couldn't and he didn't want to finish.
                No he wasn't winning.

                He was down on all three scorecards, by wide margins on two of them.

                Comment


                • #18
                  🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 Nah you’ll just take a knee and QUIT again like the B*TCH you are😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭
                  Absolutely pathetic!

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    Originally posted by Clenelo View Post
                    Good payday for Errol Spence, I'd like to see the rematch at 154, but I kinda doubt Errol would want to fight there because he still has plenty of 5 star fights waiting him at 147.
                    Wrong! Spence said he will rematch Brook if he is able to get a title at 154.

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      Originally posted by Sledgeweather17 View Post
                      No he wasn't winning.

                      He was down on all three scorecards, by wide margins on two of them.
                      He won like 4 rounds, Spence was literally dominating the fight by the 11th round. Brook and his fans are delusion at its finest.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP