Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

NSB Pick 'em #8 Scott Quigg vs Oscar Valdez & #9 Mikey Garcia vs Sergey Lipinets

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    Originally posted by Koba-Grozny View Post
    Any chance of a sticky BIGPOPPAPUMP ?
    That sounds so wrong dude haha

    Comment


    • #22
      Originally posted by *TonyMontana* View Post
      That sounds so wrong dude haha
      I probably should have read that back before posting...

      Comment


      • #23
        Originally posted by SceneBoxer View Post
        Can you enlighten me on this tasty tainted beef, "2x on Lipinets"?

        For example, I pick Lipinets with a 3x multiplier so if Lipinets wins, my total points will be = Points Earned x 3 (my multiplier) x 2 (the 2x on Lipinets). Is that correct?
        Do it

        If Lipinets wins that will put you right ahead

        Down back down now

        Comment


        • #24
          BLASTER1-Valdez k/o 9-12
          - Garcia k/o 5-8 ×2

          Comment


          • #25
            Originally posted by *TonyMontana* View Post
            Do it

            If Lipinets wins that will put you right ahead

            Down back down now
            I already made my pick (actually gambled) on Lipinets before I asked that clarification.

            Comment


            • #26
              Ganondorf- Garcia, KO, 9-12
              Scott Quigg, Dec, Close

              All just 1X.

              Comment


              • #27
                Szef

                Quigg, decision, close

                Garcia, KO 5-8, x3
                Last edited by Szef; 03-09-2018, 01:57 PM.

                Comment


                • #28
                  Originally posted by Szef View Post
                  Szef

                  Valdez, decision, close

                  Garcia, KO 5-8, x3
                  Ah. Now you're here I just thought I'd bring up something that john noticed. After the first 3 fights of the year (Spence, Usyk and Gassiev wins) your leaderboard entry carried over from the original pick 'em has you down as 3 correct (though oddly a streak of only 2), but having used a x2 and a x3 which would be impossible with your 85 pts at the time. I suspect your points total is probably correct but that you had only 2 correct picks, not 3, would that be right?

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    Originally posted by Koba-Grozny View Post
                    Ah. Now you're here I just thought I'd bring up something that john noticed. After the first 3 fights of the year (Spence, Usyk and Gassiev wins) your leaderboard entry carried over from the original pick 'em has you down as 3 correct (though oddly a streak of only 2), but having used a x2 and a x3 which would be impossible with your 85 pts at the time. I suspect your points total is probably correct but that you had only 2 correct picks, not 3, would that be right?
                    Yeah maybe, I don't remember tbh. But probably, yes.

                    All I know is that I picked Eubank and Dorticos to win but on the leader board it says I picked correctly 6 times so somethings not right. Bob been drinking on the job.

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      Originally posted by Szef View Post
                      Yeah maybe, I don't remember tbh. But probably, yes.

                      All I know is that I picked Eubank and Dorticos to win but on the leader board it says I picked correctly 6 times so somethings not right. Bob been drinking on the job.
                      I'll get to the bottom of it, man. Good luck with this weeks picks.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP