Edwin Valero vs. Vassyl Lomachenko at 135

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • RomanReigns
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Jun 2016
    • 2975
    • 243
    • 361
    • 49,773

    #1

    Edwin Valero vs. Vassyl Lomachenko at 135

    Who wins this fight??

    73
    Valero via KO
    31.51%
    23
    Loma via KO
    26.03%
    19
    Valero via Decision
    0.00%
    0
    Loma via Decision
    42.47%
    31
    Draw
    0.00%
    0
  • Raggamuffin
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Aug 2016
    • 8195
    • 453
    • 961
    • 43,263

    #2
    Valero would’ve beat the **** out of Loma. He would’ve broke his ass down and stopped him.

    Comment

    • just the facts
      Undisputed Champion
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Jan 2014
      • 13770
      • 2,432
      • 1,021
      • 88,113

      #3
      Loma by wide decision.

      Comment

      • asgarth
        Moderator
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • May 2010
        • 3180
        • 268
        • 144
        • 36,835

        #4
        What are valeros top5 wins?

        Comment

        • richardt
          Undisputed Champion
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Nov 2007
          • 22045
          • 2,594
          • 201
          • 77,067

          #5
          Originally posted by Raggamuffin
          Valero would’ve beat the **** out of Loma. He would’ve broke his ass down and stopped him.
          The only top fighter he ever defeated was himself. non-descript DeMarco doesn't compare remotely to Lom's resume.
          Last edited by richardt; 03-02-2018, 10:32 AM.

          Comment

          • bigjavi973
            Undisputed Champion
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Oct 2013
            • 24007
            • 759
            • 1,480
            • 1,236,071

            #6
            valero > salido......

            'nough said

            Comment

            • New England
              Strong champion.
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Oct 2010
              • 37514
              • 1,926
              • 1,486
              • 97,173

              #7
              valero was insanely talented, but he didn't have the schooling or toolbox that lomachenko has. and lomachenko is just as talented. valero hit harder, lomachenko moves better.

              i'm picking lomachenko in what would have probably been a classic. would love to see what it looks like when lomachenko gets his bell rung.

              Comment

              • Thraxox
                Banned
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Sep 2016
                • 9363
                • 339
                • 56
                • 112,604

                #8
                Originally posted by New England
                valero was insanely talented, but he didn't have the schooling or toolbox that lomachenko has. and lomachenko is just as talented. valero hit harder, lomachenko moves better.

                i'm picking lomachenko in what would have probably been a classic. would love to see what it looks like when lomachenko gets his bell rung.
                I don't like how people are painting Valero as some sort of mindless murderous brawler. The dude knows how set up feints, counter punch and slip counter.

                Comment

                • chrisJS
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Mar 2007
                  • 8989
                  • 331
                  • 64
                  • 78,477

                  #9
                  I always thought that ****ing scumbag coward was overrated and had sloppy technique until his last fight he impressed me against DeMarco, but then again DeMarco made Broner look like an elite level fighter. A lot of folks around the gyms here from that time swear by Valero's raw talent and what he did in the gym but it had yet to come out in the ring. People that saw him up close swear he would have KO'd Marquez, Morales, Pacquaio and Barrera. I think Marquez and Pacquaio would have made mincemeat of him.

                  Loma has already far exceeded his accomplishments and competition level and produced in the gym and ring. He's the far better boxer and would likely just win a wide decision. Valero is a coward too so he could quit if things aren't going his way.
                  Last edited by chrisJS; 03-02-2018, 11:19 AM.

                  Comment

                  • New England
                    Strong champion.
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Oct 2010
                    • 37514
                    • 1,926
                    • 1,486
                    • 97,173

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Thraxox
                    I don't like how people are painting Valero as some sort of mindless murderous brawler. The dude knows how set up feints, counter punch and slip counter.


                    i'm not saying that either, if that's what your post is implying. valero had a lot of physical talent. i always thought his power was overrated, not his talent elsewhere. he hit hard in part because he was super sharp. check out my posts from when he was alive.

                    i'm saying he doesn't hav ehte craft of lomachenko, who had 300 amateur fights and is arguably the most skilled boxer in the world right now in addition to his talents.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP