Comments Thread For: Sanchez: If Canelo Defrauds Public Again - Fans Should Boycott!

[Tiger 007]

This guy is desperate, he is begging Canelo to just stand and throw shots...this is hilarious...........when you start hearing **** like this you know the show is over people

you canelo fans arent going to be so full of it when ggg puts this red hobbit to sleep

[Larry the boss]

you canelo fans arent going to be so full of it when ggg puts this red hobbit to sleep

another alt.

[HandsofIron]

Sanchez is an excuse-making muppet who is blurting out childish excuses to justify why his fighter fell short, and got exposed by a smaller fighter whom Golovkin was supposed to walk all over

which is exactly what Roach did after Pacquiao/Marquez III

Well I'm gonna have to disagree with you, Golovkin won the first fight but I didn't have a problem with the draw. And I'm not bias either as I used support Alvarez. Don't really care who wins the rematch.

[aboutfkntime]

Well I'm gonna have to disagree with you, Golovkin won the first fight but I didn't have a problem with the draw. And I'm not bias either as I used support Alvarez. Don't really care who wins the rematch.

I think that Sanchez reeks of desperation

I agree with these thoughts.....

This guy is desperate, he is begging Canelo to just stand and throw shots...this is hilarious...........when you start hearing **** like this you know the show is over people

pleading your opponent to use a style that makes it easy for you ..... is most un-Mexican

[TonyGe]

I think that Sanchez reeks of desperation

I agree with these thoughts.....





pleading your opponent to use a style that makes it easy for you ..... is most un-Mexican

Yeah and it's an insult to his fighter.

[aboutfkntime]

Yeah and it's an insult to his fighter.

pleading for Canelo to fight doe-to-doe, is an insult to boxing fans

the art of boxing..... is being able to dismantle a larger opponent and supposed killer, simply because you are better

the first notable example happened about 120 years ago

NOTE: I do not recall hearing the great John L criticize his opponents style..... quite the contrary, he justified/applauded it

that uncanny ability..... the ability that first amazed me back when Leonard did it to Hearns, and subsequently fueled a lifelong passion for the art..... seems to be completely lost on you casual fan idiots

Sanchez words are embarrassing, shameful, and they most definitely do reflect on his fighter..... who supposedly had the answer to all of those questions

[TonyGe]

pleading for Canelo to fight doe-to-doe, is an insult to boxing fans

the art of boxing..... is being able to dismantle a larger opponent and supposed killer, simply because you are better

the first notable example happened about 120 years ago

NOTE: I do not recall hearing the great John L criticize his opponents style..... quite the contrary, he justified/applauded it

that uncanny ability..... the ability that first amazed me back when Leonard did it to Hearns, and subsequently fueled a lifelong passion for the art..... seems to be completely lost on you casual fan idiots

Sanchez words are embarrassing, shameful, and they most definitely do reflect on his fighter..... who supposedly had the answer to all of those questions

In fairness to Golovkin most of the chatter about Canelo is coming from his trainer. Golovkin has been silent on this lately. Tommy Hearns along with Duran are my favorite fighters. Tommy was not out boxed by Leonard. In fact it was the complete opposite. Tommy was out boxing Leonard. Leonard switched to a slugger and hurt Hearns. Hearns then reverted to boxing started to pull away and Leonard again turned into the puncher and stopped him. To my best recollection Tommy has never been outboxed. Is Leonard better than Hearns? Well Tommy annihilated Duran and Leonard lost the first fight to Duran. Tommy also fought Leonard to a highly disputed draw against Leonard and Leonard admitted after that Tommy beat him.
To me boxing is about using your best attributes whether it's being a mauling slugger or a straight up boxer and make the other guy fight your fight. No boxing isn't about a smaller guy out boxing a bigger guy. It's about winning the fight..Frankly I wouldn't have got into this but I resent being called a casual idiot.

[aboutfkntime]

In fairness to Golovkin most of the chatter about Canelo is coming from his trainer. Golovkin has been silent on this lately. Tommy Hearns along with Duran are my favorite fighters. Tommy was not out boxed by Leonard. In fact it was the complete opposite. Tommy was out boxing Leonard. Leonard switched to a slugger and hurt Hearns. Hearns then reverted to boxing started to pull away and Leonard again turned into the puncher and stopped him. To my best recollection Tommy has never been outboxed. Is Leonard better than Hearns? Well Tommy annihilated Duran and Leonard lost the first fight to Duran. Tommy also fought Leonard to a highly disputed draw against Leonard and Leonard admitted after that Tommy beat him.
To me boxing is about using your best attributes whether it's being a mauling slugger or a straight up boxer and make the other guy fight your fight. No boxing isn't about a smaller guy out boxing a bigger guy. It's about winning the fight..Frankly I wouldn't have got into this but I resent being called a casual idiot.

Golovkin has talked utter BOLLOCKS for FIVE YEARS !!

To me boxing is about using your best attributes whether it's being a mauling slugger or a straight up boxer and make the other guy fight your fight. No boxing isn't about a smaller guy out boxing a bigger guy. It's about winning the fight..Frankly I wouldn't have got into this but I resent being called a casual idiot.

then stop embarrassing yourself by supporting Idiot Sanchez when he pleads for Canelo to stand still so that Golovkin can hit him

that **** is downright embarrassing, and most un-Mexican

did not hear Hearns pleading with his opponent to stand still

[TonyGe]

Golovkin has talked utter BOLLOCKS for FIVE YEARS !!





then stop embarrassing yourself by supporting Idiot Sanchez when he pleads for Canelo to stand still so that Golovkin can hit him

that **** is downright embarrassing, and most un-Mexican

did not hear Hearns pleading with his opponent to stand still

Are you ******ed? I said flat out that Sanchez was the guy talking this point up. I also said he wasn't being fair to his fighter. How the hell is that defending Sanchez. You know I've been somewhat critical of Sanchez in the past. And what the heck is your blathering about Golovkin got anything to do with my post about what constitutes a winning style for a boxer. No one takes you seriously. All you do is look for an opportunity to spew out your agenda.

[aboutfkntime]

Are you ******ed? I said flat out that Sanchez was the guy talking this point up. I also said he wasn't being fair to his fighter. How the hell is that defending Sanchez. You know I've been somewhat critical of Sanchez in the past. And what the heck is your blathering about Golovkin got anything to do with my post about what constitutes a winning style for a boxer. No one takes you seriously. All you do is look for an opportunity to spew out your agenda.

nah, I did not hear you say any of that