Comments Thread For: DiBella: Hearn Wouldn't Make Joshua-Ortiz; Don't Question Wilder
Collapse
-
-
Every time Dumbella speaks he exposes himself to not knowing whats going on . It explains alot with the Wilder mismanagement .Comment
-
Comment
-
Just like I'm sure Hearn promised Ortiz a Joshua fight against AJ when he signed with him only for Hearn to realize that Ortiz was too high of a risk for AJ. Ortiz was AJs mandatory but somehow Hearn never was willing to make the fight. Yet somehow Ortiz gets his mandatory stripped from the WBA for a failed test and the WBA replaces him with Povetkin (who has failed previous drug test) and Hearn is willing to make that fight.
US desperate for Wilder to be validated, willing to overlook how **** Ortiz has been for years.Comment
-
More importantly, nobody is forcing Wilder to fight King Kong and you have zero evidence of that. You literally just made that up.Comment
-
When Ortiz was suspended, he lost his ranking. Same thing happened to Briggs. Ortiz won't be fighting Joshua any time soon unless it's a voluntary or a unification. If Ortiz loses to Wilder, it would take a long time to become WBA mandatory again.Comment
-
Robbie, can't you even try to fairly assess things? Do you really have to be so obsessively pro AJ? If Wilder has only fought bums, why did AJ defend his title against a "bum" Wilder had already knocked out? What would that say about AJ that he wanted sloppy seconds of someone you say is a bum?
More importantly, nobody is forcing Wilder to fight King Kong and you have zero evidence of that. You literally just made that up.
Common sense that Ortiz would have been promised a shot. Very unlikely Ortiz would have signed without it. You know this stop playing ******.Comment
Comment