Scoring fights: GGG's style makes his work underestimated

[BillyBoxing]

when did this happen??

GGG after the fight



Canelo after the fight

September 16th

[BillyBoxing]

He can't go from unbeatable to underestimated. You can't have it both ways.

I got that but did anyone questioned that he was winning each fight? Did anyone think his work is underestimated so he needed a KO to get a victory against Murray, Lemieux, or Stevens?

I never said he was unbeatable, nobody is.

Maybe because those fights were not competitive?

[TonyGe]

I guarantee you it was 100% Canelo's plan to take the middle rounds off and lead Golovkin to the ropes, just like Lara did to Angulo. He just didn't expect Golovkin to have that much stamina.

And lol at schooling, Golovkin looked absolutely awful that night, Canelo lost by not fighting. How is outlanding on jabs only, half of which were taps, while getting outlanded on power shots while throwing 70 more a schooling? How is losing 5 rounds out of 7 a schooling against a smaller, less powerful boxer?

If it was Canelos plan as you say to take the middle rounds off and essentially give them away to the most dangerous opponent he's ever faced then his boxing IQ is extremely low. Canello went to the ropes and did very little while G just piled up points. No he got schooled and out hustled by a 35 year old fighter.

[TonyGe]

But everything revolves around compubox. That’s the whole premise as to why Triple Gee fans claim he beat Bummelo. The only other angle is that Bummelo ran. It’s either one or those two things to Triple Gee fans.

Therefore, 40 more punches over Bummelo isn’t a “dominant” win. Like I said, 3 punches more per round to Triple Gee. So which infamous punches were these? Jabs?

Whatever reason, Bummelo can easily match Triple Gees ratio.

Notice nobody ever dissected Triple Gee’s 40 more punches in detail. Why?!

The DRAW was fair. People should focus on what both fighters will do differently

No the draw was not fair. No Golovkin fans don't look at only punch stats. Golovkin got robbed. He controlled the fight. He forced Canello to the ropes. He was more active and won more minutes of each round. Canello could not hold the center of the ring for very long. He got schooled by Golovkin.

[Morrie ATG]

No the draw was not fair. No Golovkin fans don't look at only punch stats. Golovkin got robbed. He controlled the fight. He forced Canello to the ropes. He was more active and won more minutes of each round. Canello could not hold the center of the ring for very long. He got schooled by Golovkin.

The performance has already been explained. It’s impossible to justify any dominance from either one. Triple Gee fans hate to hear it. They’re so mad that they say “robbed” not even knowing the logic of a robbery.

Two judges had it close. Even if Byrd had it 115-113 it’s still a draw. If she scored it a draw, it would still be a draw, and thus two judges would be accused of bribery for the draw. One judge drawing who had Triple Gee beating Jacobs, yes, the New York judge.

Triple Gee fans will enjoy the Draw while it lasts. This is Triple Gee in the rematch.

[HarvardBlue]

I never said he was unbeatable, nobody is.

Maybe not you but a lot of people made him out to be unbeatable.

Maybe because those fights were not competitive?

Exactly!

He looked great against mediocre opponents... Unbeatable! Unstoppable! Monster!

He didn't look great against better opponents...
He's old... Boxing fans underestimate his work because of his style.

If Golovkin was as a good as some people made him out to be (98% of boxing media and an entire television network), he would've KO'd Jacobs in less than 8 and he would've walked down the smaller Canelo and either stop him or dominated him.

[BillyBoxing]

Maybe not you but a lot of people made him out to be unbeatable.


Exactly!

He looked great against mediocre opponents... Unbeatable! Unstoppable! Monster!

He didn't look great against better opponents...
He's old... Boxing fans underestimate his work because of his style.

If Golovkin was as a good as some people made him out to be (98% of boxing media and an entire television network), he would've KO'd Jacobs in less than 8 and he would've walked down the smaller Canelo and either stop him or dominate him.

Golovkin is a monster puncher but not unbeatable, people get carried away by power, it happened with Tyson, Tua, Kovalev, Shavers, GGG, G McClellan.

They finally were far from unbeatable and often disappointed a lot.
I wish you could understand that, or maybe you started watching boxing last year?

Right now he's in the best division and he is old, he's gonna have some tough close fights.

If he beats Canelo then he deserves major props.

Canelo ain't smaller, I bet he was at least 5 pounds heavier than triple fight night.

He beat Jacobs, Jacobs is far from being easy to deal with.

He destroyed Quillin in one round, schooled Truax who just beat De Gale for the 168 WBC title.

Jacobs would beat most 168 pounders champ.
And he's better than Charlo, quicker and better skillset, more proven at 160.

[Morrie ATG]

.

Canelo ain't smaller, I bet he was at least 5 pounds heavier than triple fight night.

.

Right... here we go again with lies and myths. How do you guys make this stuff up? What’s next, Hurd and Charlo are weight bullies to Triple Gee?

[TonyGe]

The performance has already been explained. It’s impossible to justify any dominance from either one. Triple Gee fans hate to hear it. They’re so mad that they say “robbed” not even knowing the logic of a robbery.

Two judges had it close. Even if Byrd had it 115-113 it’s still a draw. If she scored it a draw, it would still be a draw, and thus two judges would be accused of bribery for the draw. One judge drawing who had Triple Gee beating Jacobs, yes, the New York judge.

Triple Gee fans will enjoy the Draw while it lasts. This is Triple Gee in the rematch.

The draw was a farce. Yes I know the logic of a robbery. That was a robbery. Golovkin's won the fight 8 rounds to 4. Canelo showed poor ring savey. He could win the rematch but not if he doesn't make significant changes.

[Morrie ATG]

The draw was a farce. Yes I know the logic of a robbery. That was a robbery. Golovkin's won the fight 8 rounds to 4. Canelo showed poor ring savey. He could win the rematch but not if he doesn't make significant changes.

So if you say the draw was a farce then you acknowledge that Don Trella can be bout to the highest bidder. Which means Loeffler had more money to bribe Trella in Jacobs vs GGG correct?

Again, you don’t know what a robbery is. If anything, Trella robbed both Oscar and Loeffler correct, cause he was supposed to favor the fighter for whom he was paid to favor.