If Marquez was ....

[VERSION1 (V1)]

you're overlooking one main thing doe!

did he win against floyd????

so conor will be coming off a loss!

09-10 BOTH pac and floyd were coming off great wins!!! so they're BOTH even there, but if we look at their total ppv numbers then pac beat floyd by over a mil in 09-10!

and if he fights the loser of GGG vs Canelo would he be the A-side if Canelo lost

[WesternChamp]

and if he fights the loser of GGG vs Canelo would he be the A-side if Canelo lost

they BOTH will be coming off a loss!

so if conor is the a-side, it wont be by much!

this is what you're trying to ignored.

BOTH pac and floyd was coming off great wins in 09-10!! the only difference is that pac edge floyd out in total ppv for 09-10, and that's why pac WAS the a-side.

[WesternChamp]

and if he fights the loser of GGG vs Canelo would he be the A-side if Canelo lost

and how desperate are you? bringing up conor when he's not a boxer and comparing it to pac/floyd when pac has been a pro boxer since the 90s!

[VERSION1 (V1)]

and how desperate are you? bringing up conor when he's not a boxer and comparing it to pac/floyd when pac has been a pro boxer since the 90s!

im going by ppv it should not matter he drew more ppv then anybody as on a boxing ppv in a boxing ring

[WesternChamp]

im going by ppv it should not matter he drew more ppv then anybody as on a boxing ppv in a boxing ring

he's coming off a loss big guy!!

in 09-10, pac wasnt! let that sink in.

[PAC-BOY]

....Right but the sample size for Pacquaio is bigger

I don't know how I can say this any other way.

Common opponents means a lot actually, not nothing. Especially when deciding who the bigger draw is.

I agree common opponents do matter and have something to do with it. Its not all of it but it is a factor. Glad you brought that up. Still has nothing to do with MORE MONEY earned and more PPV buys sold. But Manny and Floyd had a lot of common opponents. The ones they did have and can be compared to Manny beat them In better fashion. Take DLH Cotto Hatton Mosley for example. (please spare me the reason you think Manny won blah blah blah...heard all that shlt before) Point is the opponent matter but isnt everything.
in the 2000's (00-09 )was fighter of the year in 07 for his fight with DLH and Hatton. yay ! Manny was fighter of the year 3 times. 06,08,and 09! For in that same decade with fights with Morales Larios Marquez Barrera DLH Hatton Cotto to name a few and named fighter of the decade. Along with more career earnings than Floyd. You still think Manny wasnt the a side before his loss to JMM4 ?

[PAC-BOY]

In that time he wasn’t? Don’t lie. The power of Chickenweather controls all!

`

[VERSION1 (V1)]

they BOTH will be coming off a loss!

so if conor is the a-side, it wont be by much!

this is what you're trying to ignored.

BOTH pac and floyd was coming off great wins in 09-10!! the only difference is that pac edge floyd out in total ppv for 09-10, and that's why pac WAS the a-side.

im not ignoring anything based on what you said im using recent ppv buys

[WesternChamp]

im not ignoring anything based on what you said im using recent ppv buys

yeah using recent ppv. but you failed to answer was pac coming off a loss, a tko loss in 09-10??? i'll wait.......

[WesternChamp]

im not ignoring anything based on what you said im using recent ppv buys

if pac was coming off a loss, a tko loss at that, in 09-10, then we wouldnt be having this debate. floyd was the a-side. BUT that's not the case here. pac was coming off great wins, i might even said it was better than floyd in 09-10! the only reason why pac WAS the a-side is because he edge floyd out in the ppv total in 09-10. i know this hurts.