Would Kell Brook had beaten Keith Thurman

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • daggum
    All time great
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Feb 2008
    • 43683
    • 4,650
    • 3
    • 166,270

    #11
    Originally posted by future hendrixx
    its a shame spence cannot get full credit for beating brook because he decided to move up and get his face destroyed. . which is pathetic because he made 147 and didn't look drained to me. i personally give spence full credit but in the history books that win has an asterisk.

    i would favor brook over thurman 60-40. i think he's a better boxer. his jab and size would be huge hurdle for keith. sht thurman had to box on the back foot to survive danny i think brook can wear him down. i even see thurman having issues vs peterson to be honest.

    thurman has 2 very big wins. but none were emphatic. both danny and porter feel like they're entitled to a rematch. so its not like keith is so far ahead of the pack.
    danny at ww isnt a big win. he has done nothing there. even porter is iffy if that is really a big win but danny was a big name not a big win

    Comment

    • Sheldon312
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Apr 2016
      • 2650
      • 165
      • 65
      • 33,229

      #12
      Originally posted by daggum
      danny at ww isnt a big win. he has done nothing there. even porter is iffy if that is really a big win but danny was a big name not a big win
      Good point. Thurman still has top 3 or top 5 resume

      Comment

      • b00g13man
        Undisputed Champion
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Dec 2012
        • 12197
        • 265
        • 51
        • 34,905

        #13
        I would've picked Kell. We'll never know now.

        Comment

        Working...
        TOP