Who's better: Spence or Manny Pacquiao in his Prime?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • D4thincarnation
    Undisputed Champion
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Jan 2011
    • 16198
    • 533
    • 260
    • 133,240

    #71
    Pacquiao would beat Spence probably stop him in 8

    From 2008 to 2010 Pacquiao was a beast, fast always moving, ferocious, power both hands, hard to hit, brilliant foot work, could easily throw a thousand punches a fight and had a great chin, as shown in the Cotto fight.


    He is faster than Spence, better footwork than spence, more power than Spence, more elusive than Spence and more stamina than Spence.

    Pacquiao from literally from Marquez II to Marquez III.

    From 2008 to 2010 he won every round with ease with his opponents just trying to survive as that was a victory for them.


    Spence has show he can be out boxed, and he can be easily tagged, hard to see what he could do against Pacquiao.

    Pacquiao beats him up and stops him in 8.

    Comment

    • Dean_Razorback
      God of Thunder and R n' R
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Jan 2013
      • 16559
      • 1,028
      • 396
      • 98,048

      #72
      prime manny pulls a margarito vs spence. he is just to damn fast and spence doesn't seem hard to hit

      Comment

      • D4thincarnation
        Undisputed Champion
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Jan 2011
        • 16198
        • 533
        • 260
        • 133,240

        #73
        Originally posted by Long jabber
        Pac and may defined a boxing era for a reason. Speed kills and a prime pac was faster than anyone around in his prime. Spence just doesn't have that special something to beat a prime pacman
        Spence was 20 when Pacquiao was in his prime, but he was nowhere to be seen. He is 28 now. He has only got about 3 years till he starts to decline.

        Spence's best years will be 2018 and 2019 come 2020 he will be on the downward slope, he won't be getting any better.

        Comment

        • D4thincarnation
          Undisputed Champion
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Jan 2011
          • 16198
          • 533
          • 260
          • 133,240

          #74
          Originally posted by Dean_Razorback
          prime manny pulls a margarito vs spence. he is just to damn fast and spence doesn't seem hard to hit
          Spence hits hard, but not that one punch knockout power.

          Also Pacquiao was very hard to hit during his prime, his footwork and his constant movement made him hard to tag.

          Comment

          • bender2000
            Interim Champion
            Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
            • Sep 2011
            • 648
            • 100
            • 167
            • 11,964

            #75
            Originally posted by SthPaw
            Spence is making waves right now for whatever reasons please you, but come on...asking about him vs the Pacquiao of yesteryear is ridiculous.

            If anyone in here thinks the current Spence (not his potential, not what you think he may eventually be...) beats a primed and still vicious Manny Pacquiao, then please, explain to me exactly why.
            yes people are way to quick to label a fighter "great " give him time and good opponents first then judge spence , its way to early to consider him as an atg but manny definatley is.

            Comment

            • BennyST
              Shhhh...
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Nov 2007
              • 9263
              • 1,036
              • 500
              • 21,301

              #76
              Originally posted by Shontae De'marc
              Boxers from the past always beat boxers of today - this is an indisputable fact.

              Boxers from years gone by were better in every way and if you disagree then YDKSAB.
              What are you talking about? Pacquiao is from the past? Has boxing scientifically evolved in the last...errrr...year?

              Comment

              • suffolkbull3
                Interim Champion
                Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                • Jan 2018
                • 637
                • 31
                • 1
                • 12,052

                #77
                r u guys seriously out of yo minds???? if this fight took place at 147, spence would absolutely maul any version of pacman!! what r u guys smoking man?? can i have some?

                Comment

                • GrandmasterWang
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Jun 2017
                  • 2073
                  • 131
                  • 89
                  • 39,916

                  #78
                  Originally posted by Thraxox
                  It took Spence 11 rounds to TKO a recently KO'ed coming off of a surgery Brook weight drained Brook of 13 pounds, and took Spence 7 rounds to TKO Peterson who Mathysse iced inside 4 rounds.

                  On top of that Spence's leaky defense, and the fact that he would be the one coming forward, he's too easy to hit and against a Prime Pacquiao he is bread and butter for him.

                  Cotto is drained? So should we agree also that Canelo Alvarez was emasculated against Floyd Mayweather? If Cotto is drained then what is Alvarez and Kell Brook? It seems to me in the pics that Cotto at 145 looked far better than Canelo at 152.
                  Solid post. Prime Pacquiao I think would be too much for Spence. In fact Im not sure that Spence would be able to get past 145 pound Cotto.

                  Going from the weigh ins 145 pound Cotto looked far more healthy than Zombienelo at 152.

                  Comment

                  • suffolkbull3
                    Interim Champion
                    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                    • Jan 2018
                    • 637
                    • 31
                    • 1
                    • 12,052

                    #79
                    so now kell brook was drained even though he was the ww champion of the world.. u cant say brook was drained vs spence without saying porter is horrendous cause he lost to a drained brook as well

                    Comment

                    • D4thincarnation
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                      • Jan 2011
                      • 16198
                      • 533
                      • 260
                      • 133,240

                      #80
                      Originally posted by suffolkbull3
                      so now kell brook was drained even though he was the ww champion of the world.. u cant say brook was drained vs spence without saying porter is horrendous cause he lost to a drained brook as well
                      Are you forgetting Brook moving up to middleweight and weighing in 13lbs heavier whilst still looking cut?


                      You don't think he had to lose muscle mass?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP