Crawford vs spence would be Mayweather v Pac all over again

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Larry the boss
    EDUCATED
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Jan 2011
    • 90798
    • 6,419
    • 4,473
    • 2,500,480

    #21
    Originally posted by WesternChamp
    when 2 offensive minded fighters fight each other, one has to be superior than the other. the least superior one will turn defensive or get ko'd. simple. it happens to everyone larry. sorry to burst your bubble.
    What bubble, i didnt say neither had defense, just that they were not elite defenders. Crawford does have the better defense IMO

    Comment

    • N!Ck F.
      Interim Champion
      Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
      • Jul 2017
      • 984
      • 226
      • 0
      • 14,737

      #22
      Originally posted by Geon
      LOOOOOOOOOL Spence faster and better iq than Crawford?
      Crawford is 100% faster and Spence is more intelligent based off what. To be frank theres nothing particular intelligent about his style. Very meticulous and effective but intelligent? Nope
      Are you actually claiming you think Crawford is the superior boxer to Spence? That’s like saying Pacquiao is better then Floyd.. simply not true.
      Crawford is awesome, but Spence is unreal. AND HES BIGGER then Crawford. Imagine if Spence fought all he guys Crawford fought, literally would have a 100% ko rate and probably not fight more than 5-6 rounds against any of them. Now imagine Crawford fights Spence’s Opponents (he would beat *Most*) but imo would not beat Kell Brook, would not have stopped Peterson and algieri in 7 & 5 rounds like Spence, and would not allegedly **** up floyd in sparring so bad he was not asked to return & would not be able to compete in sparring with the likes of Jermell Charlo like Spence does. Again, Crawford is outstanding, but Spence is better and imo beats him 99/100 times they fight.

      Comment

      Working...
      TOP