NSB Pick 'em #2 - Oleksandr Usyk vs Mairis Briedis, Jan 27

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BrometheusBob.
    All Time Great
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Apr 2015
    • 20457
    • 915
    • 1,915
    • 156,555

    #1

    NSB Pick 'em #2 - Oleksandr Usyk vs Mairis Briedis, Jan 27

    BETTING ODDS: The books have Usyk 5.5/1 to 10/1 to win, averaging around 7/1. Briedis picks receive a 1.75X multiplier.

    You only need to post in this thread to indicate if you'd like to use one of your 2X or 3X multipliers. EG.
    BrometheusBob.,2X
    If you are using no multiplier (1X), and not picking a draw, just voting in the poll puts you in. I will assume you want 1X unless you post otherwise.

    NOTES:
    -Draws are worth 120pts. A perfect pick without a multiplier is 30pts.

    -CLOSE is <12 pts difference, or anything closer than 116-112 on all three scorecards. WIDE is >=12 pts difference, or anything equivalent to 116-112 on all three cards or wider.

    -If you'd like to change your pick before the fight starts, post in this thread to do so. Ideally tag me so that I don't miss it.

    -2X doubles your points and 3X triples your points. Everyone starts with 5 doubles and 3 triples to use throughout the year. If you forget how many you have left, check the leaderboard in the master thread.

    Sticky me -MEGA-
    102
    Usyk by Close Decision
    25.49%
    26
    Usyk by Wide Decision
    44.12%
    45
    Usyk by KO 1-4
    0.98%
    1
    Usyk by KO 5-8
    9.80%
    10
    Usyk by KO 9-12
    17.65%
    18
    Briedis by Close Decision
    0.98%
    1
    Briedis by Wide Decision
    0.00%
    0
    Briedis by KO 1-4
    0.00%
    0
    Briedis by KO 5-8
    0.98%
    1
    Briedis by KO 9-12
    0.00%
    0

    The poll is expired.

  • Eff Pandas
    Banned
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Apr 2012
    • 52131
    • 3,624
    • 2,147
    • 1,635,919

    #2
    3x my points on this one

    Comment

    • DuckAdonis
      Undisputed Champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Jul 2017
      • 7775
      • 197
      • 84
      • 188,446

      #3
      Usyk by wide decision, 116-112, 117-111, something like that

      On the road to become undisputed !

      Comment

      • Citizen Koba
        Deplorable Peacenik
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Jun 2013
        • 20443
        • 3,941
        • 3,786
        • 2,875,273

        #4
        Originally posted by DuckAdonis
        Usyk by wide decision, 116-112, 117-111, something like that

        On the road to become undisputed !
        116 - 112 counts as 'close' for the purposes of the Pick 'em. Just sayin', man.

        Comment

        • DuckAdonis
          Undisputed Champion
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Jul 2017
          • 7775
          • 197
          • 84
          • 188,446

          #5
          Originally posted by Koba-Grozny
          116 - 112 counts as 'close' for the purposes of the Pick 'em. Just sayin', man.
          >
          "WIDE is >=12 pts difference, or anything equivalent to 116-112 on all three cards or wider."


          This is what it says in the op, so on all 3 scorecards 116-112 is wide right ?

          Comment

          • Snoop Frog
            Interim Champion
            Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
            • May 2015
            • 992
            • 279
            • 519
            • 21,945

            #6
            3X for Usyk by close decision

            Comment

            • Citizen Koba
              Deplorable Peacenik
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Jun 2013
              • 20443
              • 3,941
              • 3,786
              • 2,875,273

              #7
              Originally posted by DuckAdonis
              >
              "WIDE is >=12 pts difference, or anything equivalent to 116-112 on all three cards or wider."


              This is what it says in the op, so on all 3 scorecards 116-112 is wide right ?
              Oooops - my bad. Yeah, you're right... I misread the >= as just >. Which is a shame because 116 - 112 is pretty much the exact result I had in mind. Hmmm. I'll have to give it some thought but might have to change my pick to wide.

              Comment

              • BrometheusBob.
                All Time Great
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Apr 2015
                • 20457
                • 915
                • 1,915
                • 156,555

                #8
                Originally posted by DuckAdonis
                >
                "WIDE is >=12 pts difference, or anything equivalent to 116-112 on all three cards or wider."


                This is what it says in the op, so on all 3 scorecards 116-112 is wide right ?
                Originally posted by Koba-Grozny
                116 - 112 counts as 'close' for the purposes of the Pick 'em. Just sayin', man.
                Originally posted by DuckAdonis
                Usyk by wide decision, 116-112, 117-111, something like that

                On the road to become undisputed !
                I changed it from last year. 116-112 on all three cards, or the equivalent (aka net score difference of 12 pts), is now wide.
                Last edited by BrometheusBob.; 01-22-2018, 12:33 PM.

                Comment

                • Madison Boxing
                  Banned
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Jul 2015
                  • 35353
                  • 6,447
                  • 3,349
                  • 190,590

                  #9
                  usyk wide X2 multiplier.

                  Comment

                  • RJJ-94-02=GOAT
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Oct 2017
                    • 28689
                    • 9,126
                    • 2,018
                    • 246,831

                    #10
                    I’ve gone for Usyk by wide decision but the fact that it’s in Latvia could mean the judges are favourable to Breidis.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP