Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Lomachenko's Manager: Pacquiao is Old, No Gain in Beating Him

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by SCEN3RY View Post
    Old or not, it's a great opportunity for Loma - financially and just to put a great scalp on his resume. The problem is, it's not a sure win and Egis knows it. Pac is still solid, and that's a different kind of challenge at 140. I like the fight honestly; it's a spectacle and there's also a bit of the unknown there - makes for an event worth anticipating.

    The reason the Crawford fight doesn't have as much appeal is bc we all believe Crawford is too much for Pac today. Loma? idk....I'm not as convinced when you account for their size, but I might yet lean towards Loma.

    But he probably shouldn't take it. If he loses to a 39 year old Pac, it might be by knockout and it'll be hard to regain his appeal after that. Worst case scenario...how worth it is it really?
    my thoughts exactly!!!!!!!

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Oldub View Post
      Lmao rigo had his shot at 126 and wouldn't take it. Then HE started calling loma out when loma went up a weight class. Something rigondeaux will likely never do except for the one off to make money. Loma isn't calling PAC out. Hop off lomas nuts
      How AM I ON LOMA'S NUTS?
      You ****** son of a bitch
      Stop swallowing his dick and stop defending his bitch ass that don't need defending

      Comment


      • The type of quote that will.come back to haunt them when the fight gets signed.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by mrjoeblive View Post
          every time pac takes a L people say he over looked his opponent or he was unmotivated. well that's his fought. spence always says you can never look past the next fighter. how is it the refs fought he didn't stop the fight when you thought he should have. if the beating was so bad, why didn't it continue? I thought JMM beat pac in the second and 3rd fight but the record says pac won. so hey it happens. pac should be fighting at 147 and if he wants to drop down to 140 he should have to be 140 on fight night and not allowed to rehydrate to 150lbs.
          That's not true and you damn well know it!

          Pac was robbed by blind judges against Bradley 1 and Horn!

          The Marquez fights were different, those fights were closer than either the Bradley 1 or Horn fight!

          Have you ever seen Pacquiao fatigue? He sure did against Horn and that leads me to know that he didn't take the fight seriously!

          If you saw how his camp was for the fight you would know Pacquiao started late and was still fumbling around while Horn was in camp even before both signed the contract 2 months out!!

          The fight was in Australia for ***s sake! That's why it wasn't stopped in the 9th, that corrupt ref was obviously an Aussi and on Horn's payroll!

          Did you not see the amount of times he allowed Horn to straight up MMA Pacquiao without any warnings?!
          Horn straight up threw him to the ground and the ref just checked Pac's gloves and said fight like nothing happened!

          The ref even told Horn he's here for his protection, what more evidence do you want of broad daylight robbery and corruption!

          You mentioned Spence who's arguably a bigger weight bully than anyone else in boxing, don't get me wrong I like Spence, he's a tremendous fighter who's schooled well!

          But, he's talking about Thurman, Garcia and Porter while he's about to fight Peterson...isnt going against what he said!?

          Comment

          Working...
          X
          TOP