-
-
for starters, USADA literally says they banned what floyd did because it masks urine tests. what you appear to be talking about is physically diluting urine with water, etc, which is very different from taking an Iv. you're not particularly coherent, so maybe you can clarify :lo1l:. i have a hard time taking people seriously when they act liek they're fifteen.
additioanlly, he's subject to random testing, which can include blood testing up to the day of the fight, and be a motivation for his taking IVS to mask whatever he doesn't want showing up on a test.
the NSAC hgad a huge problem with what floyd did and how he went about getting the exemption without their knowledge until for some miraculous reason... they didn't
. probably had nothign to do with protecting the most lucritive draw in the history of the state. no motivation there. and floyd's use of usada and giving publicity and validty to a drug testing program which tests less and costs more isn't a motivation for them to collude with him either, i suspect?
keep in mind also that pacquiao's camp rejected in 2012 a clause in the contract that would have allowed floyd to do exactly what he did this time, get a TUE without informing the athletic commission. yet here we are.
again, not a smoking gun, but FFS the guy got popped with an illegal IV on the eve of the fight, and it's a method recognized by usada to mask drugs in both blood and urine! we migh tnot even know about it if the guy wasn't caught with a needle in his arm.
if you don't suspect floyd may be guilty you're just a shill. thaty's not an inslult, it is what it is.
another gif like a 10-year-old is expected. we shall see if i care enough to respond again.Last edited by New England; 01-17-2018, 07:14 PM.Comment
-
The hell are you talking about. Diluted piss is diluted piss!!!! Are you high right now? The specific gravity test measures if the piss is diluted or not. Case closed. This is moronic.
So your point is that he's guilty because in front of the DCO he chose to mask for a test that he didn't take? Again, that's asinine.
So now we move onto a deflection??? I thought we were discussing him diluting his urine or masking his blood.the NSAC hgad a huge problem with what floyd did and how he went about getting the exemption without their knowledge until for some miraculous reason... they didn't. probably had nothign to do with protecting the most lucritive draw in the history of the state. no motivation there. and floyd's use of usada and giving publicity and validty to a drug testing program which tests less and costs more isn't a motivation for them to collude with him either, i suspect?
There was no clause in the contract that said that. All of the rules came from WADA's protocol, and Pacquiao's team sought to tweek those rules. After he did, it was sent to Mayweather and he approved of the changes. This also can be proven since the drug contract was first signed by Pacquiao and only subsequently signed by Mayweather. USADA went on record stating this as well.
Even Hauser admits that he wasn't "popped" with the IV. The DCO was with him before the weigh-in and then stayed during the IV and after to complete the sample. This information is already out there and you either aren't aware of it or you're ignoring it. How could they get a sample before the IV if he was caught with the IV?
Dude, you asked me to prove you wrong. I did just that. You responded with a whole bunch of squirming nonsense here.Last edited by travestyny; 01-17-2018, 07:25 PM.Comment
Tweet
Comment