Sus Activity In Boxing

[Slicc]

I came to the forums recently, and saw that Danny Garcia vs Brandon Rios is now a title eliminator. What did either of them do to deserve a potential title shot? Wasn't Garcia supposed to fight Porter for the mandatory position? Rios struggled against a bum his last fight, now all of a sudden he gets a chance to win the WBC strap, if he somehow beats Garcia? Why is the WBC rewarding cherry picking?

How did Canelo Alvarez and Terence Crawford get those WBO mandatory positions? Before GGG, Canelo hadn't fought a middleweight in like 2 years. He fought GGG for the WBC, WBA and IBF titles, so how'd he get the mandatory position under the WBO? Terence Crawford has never fought above 140 in his entire life. How the fuck did he manage to get the #1 spot under the WBO? This is looking like the time the IBF used to take sus ass bribes.

How many robberies do y'all think will take place this year? 2017 had plenty. Sosa wrecked Gamboa, Farmer outboxed Ogawa, Pacquiao nearly gave Horn brain damage, GGG outworked Canelo, and Murata obliterated N'dam. The judges robbed Sosa, Farmer, Pac, GGG and Murata blind. Then, there was that bullshit when Davis got a knockout with a rabbit punch. Also, when Porter got no points deducted for fouling the shit outta Berto.

[Larry the boss]

I mean What did Porter do to become mandatory yet again? beat Berto and a guy coming off of a loss?

[-Kev-]

Boxing is suspect all around. In order to enjoy it, you have to accept the corruption that comes with it. Not agree with the corruption, just accept it. It's been around for so long and nothing changes. Might as well accept it and see it as like a WWE-type of show.

[Sir_Didymus]

I mean What did Porter do to become mandatory yet again? beat Berto and a guy coming off of a loss?

That's funny because Porter was also on the other side of one these suspect incidents by the Alphabet organisations.

The IBF removed him COMPLETELY from their rankings when he lost to Kell Brook in a very close decision which deserved a rematch. They chased the rematch.

There was, till this day, no explanation given by the IBF to us or the Porters.

However at the time, in the UK, we were told on Sky Sports Hearn was in a meeting with the IBF a month after the Porter vs Brook fight behind closed doors. Yet this was not reported in the U.S. At all.

Make of it what you will but in no walk of life or business can you make a decision without outlining why.

http://www.fighthype.com/news/article25866.html