Izuagbe Ugonoh - HAYMON'S BADDEST POLISH HEAVYWEIGHT
Collapse
-
-
I dont care what you consider talent , i already know how much of a dolt you truly are . Just go through the responses on this thread alone, i cant wait to come back to this thread ( i will ) and show you once again what a fool you are .
I also picked Breazeale by mid round stoppage ,im pretty sure everyone still knows Izu is more skilled than Breazeale except you and talent has nothing to do with being punched in the head which can take all that away !Last edited by juggernaut666; 01-13-2018, 02:53 AM.Comment
-
You replied with serious responses ? Really when ? You came on the thread using the word exposed which is something newbs do ,then proceeded in a downward spiral as you always do !!!!!!!!!!!!
I dont care what you consider talent , i already know how much of a dolt you truly are . Just go through the responses on this thread alone, i cant wait to come back to this thread ( i will ) and show you once again what a fool you are .
I also picked Breazeale by mid round stoppage ,im pretty sure everyone still knows Izu is more skilled than Breazeale except you and talent has nothing to do with being punched in the head which can take all that away !
I stopped reading right there you ****** b*stard, keep telling yourself guys who get KO’d by Brezeale are “skilled” fighters😂😂😂😂
Pathetic.Comment
-
Joshua is a different case because the British are not a real (ethnic) nation, they were built on civic nationalism. In Eastern Europe, nations were built on ethnic nationalism.
Educate yourself.Comment
-
Slavic people will never get behind these imported foreigners just because their wave our flags. We have real national and racial pride, unlike the Brits and other Westerners. I couldn't care less about Izu, in fact I was glad that Breazeale knocked out this pathetic fake pretender. He is not Polish and never will be. Kownacki is the real Polish heavyweight.Comment
-
Here's why Izu is not Polish.
Polish nation, just like other nations in Eastern Europe, was built on ethnic nationalism, unlike civic nations like Britain in France. You have to be an ethnic Pole to be Polish, this has always been the basis of their national identity. National and ethnic identity is one and the same in Eastern Europe. Izu only has Polish citizenship, he will always be a total alien in Poland. That's just how it is, it's rooted deeply in history.
In explaining nation-building in Europe, the major point of differentiation is the interplay of state and nation. Whereas the earliest modern nations, Britain and France, enjoyed a long tradition of statehood, ‘late’ nations such as Germany and Italy in the 19th century combined the struggle for national unity with that for a unified state. East European national movements in most cases were liberation movements which fought for secession from the big multi-ethnic Habsburg, Romanov or Ottoman empires. To put it differently, in Western Europe nation-building went within or through an existing state or accompanied state-building following political modernization,[4] while in Eastern Europe nationalism was primarily outside or against an existing state.[5] Against the background of emerging modern capitalism and representative democracy Western nationalism had a more socio-political focus and a voluntarist definition of nationality,[6] whereas Eastern nationalism in the first place emphasised cultural and linguistic rights on the basis of an understanding of nationality based on ethnicity.[7] Out of these substantial differences the notion of ‘civic’/’Western’ versus ‘ethnic’/’Eastern’ nationalism was established.
Here you go.Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Here's why Izu is not Polish.
Polish nation, just like other nations in Eastern Europe, was built on ethnic nationalism, unlike civic nations like Britain in France. You have to be an ethnic Pole to be Polish, this has always been the basis of their national identity. National and ethnic identity is one and the same in Eastern Europe. Izu only has Polish citizenship, he will always be a total alien in Poland. That's just how it is, it's rooted deeply in history.
In explaining nation-building in Europe, the major point of differentiation is the interplay of state and nation. Whereas the earliest modern nations, Britain and France, enjoyed a long tradition of statehood, ‘late’ nations such as Germany and Italy in the 19th century combined the struggle for national unity with that for a unified state. East European national movements in most cases were liberation movements which fought for secession from the big multi-ethnic Habsburg, Romanov or Ottoman empires. To put it differently, in Western Europe nation-building went within or through an existing state or accompanied state-building following political modernization,[4] while in Eastern Europe nationalism was primarily outside or against an existing state.[5] Against the background of emerging modern capitalism and representative democracy Western nationalism had a more socio-political focus and a voluntarist definition of nationality,[6] whereas Eastern nationalism in the first place emphasised cultural and linguistic rights on the basis of an understanding of nationality based on ethnicity.[7] Out of these substantial differences the notion of ‘civic’/’Western’ versus ‘ethnic’/’Eastern’ nationalism was established.
Here you go.Comment
-
Comment
Comment