Comments Thread For: Mansour: Povetkin is Capable of Beating Any Heavyweight

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • oscar9992
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Jul 2013
    • 2888
    • 160
    • 570
    • 16,692

    #11
    Except Wlad of course...

    Comment

    • Arthur Daley
      Interim Champion
      Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
      • Feb 2011
      • 648
      • 103
      • 233
      • 7,305

      #12
      Originally posted by stellen
      If we could be 100% sure he was clean i might be bothered about povetkin. As it is, the dirty cheat can rot in the same hell as ortiz and fury for all i care.
      You should stick to only watching school boy boxing if you don't like peds in boxing.

      Comment

      • PunchyPotorff
        Undisputed Champion
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Dec 2012
        • 10384
        • 525
        • 1,304
        • 49,687

        #13
        Povetkin is very talented, and I agree with Mansour.

        On the PEDs subject, I'm starting to have some questions about the entire system. With these huge fines boxers have to pay for breaking protocol, who gets the fine money? If the sanctioning body gets it, IMO that isn't far removed from a pay-off. And then we go a step further... what of the testing company? Are they being paid to 'fix' the test result? Granted, clean is the only way, but with so many boxers getting 'caught' lately, and many of them being shocked they were caught... thinking they were clean... I'm wondering if the sanctioning bodies and the testing companies are doing some under the table dealing with each other to make each more money. I hope that isn't the case, but at this point, does anyone know for 100% certain what's up?

        Comment

        • Citizen Koba
          Deplorable Peacenik
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Jun 2013
          • 20452
          • 3,951
          • 3,801
          • 2,875,273

          #14
          Originally posted by PunchyPotorff
          Povetkin is very talented, and I agree with Mansour.

          On the PEDs subject, I'm starting to have some questions about the entire system. With these huge fines boxers have to pay for breaking protocol, who gets the fine money? If the sanctioning body gets it, IMO that isn't far removed from a pay-off. And then we go a step further... what of the testing company? Are they being paid to 'fix' the test result? Granted, clean is the only way, but with so many boxers getting 'caught' lately, and many of them being shocked they were caught... thinking they were clean... I'm wondering if the sanctioning bodies and the testing companies are doing some under the table dealing with each other to make each more money. I hope that isn't the case, but at this point, does anyone know for 100% certain what's up?
          Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

          Comment

          • Cutthroat
            SOG Ward 32-0
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Aug 2006
            • 7840
            • 403
            • 342
            • 47,242

            #15



            Pedvetkin looking a bit soft, coming off those PED's must be hard.

            Comment

            • P4Pdunny
              Undisputed Champion
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Jul 2017
              • 8097
              • 144
              • 142
              • 58,715

              #16
              agree with mansour here

              Comment

              • Tobi.G
                Germany's P4P puncher
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Dec 2004
                • 5625
                • 119
                • 25
                • 16,227

                #17
                I think its to late now, Povetkin is slipping now, not in his prime anymore.

                Comment

                • sportbuddha
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Nov 2017
                  • 1846
                  • 160
                  • 4
                  • 21,810

                  #18
                  Originally posted by Arthur Daley
                  Why? Takam is even smaller and he give Joshua major problems.
                  Povetkin showed he was better than Takam in their fight and we know Takam gave a good account of himself against Joshua, but he did still lose every round. If we're talking about the possibility of being dominant in the division, which in line with the article implies he is better than any other on his day, I think his size rather than his ability is his achilles heal in achieving this. I actually think he gives Wilder a very hard nights work though, even with the size differential, because his fundamentals are just soo good, even so, I think Wilders size/power might be a little too much. Joshua's boxing is very sound and he has every other attribute on his side, so thats the one I can see standing between Mansours claim and reality.

                  Comment

                  • Marcello
                    Contender
                    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                    • Apr 2015
                    • 141
                    • 963
                    • 226
                    • 7,450

                    #19
                    If only he could lay off the juice.

                    Comment

                    • PunchyPotorff
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                      • Dec 2012
                      • 10384
                      • 525
                      • 1,304
                      • 49,687

                      #20
                      Quote:
                      Originally Posted by PunchyPotorff View Post
                      Povetkin is very talented, and I agree with Mansour.

                      On the PEDs subject, I'm starting to have some questions about the entire system. With these huge fines boxers have to pay for breaking protocol, who gets the fine money? If the sanctioning body gets it, IMO that isn't far removed from a pay-off. And then we go a step further... what of the testing company? Are they being paid to 'fix' the test result? Granted, clean is the only way, but with so many boxers getting 'caught' lately, and many of them being shocked they were caught... thinking they were clean... I'm wondering if the sanctioning bodies and the testing companies are doing some under the table dealing with each other to make each more money. I hope that isn't the case, but at this point, does anyone know for 100% certain what's up?

                      Originally posted by Koba-Grozny
                      Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?
                      Yep. The Big Question.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP