Vasyl Lomachenko clinched the living day lights out of the poor Orlando Salido (who was horribly and unfairly treated). Yet, somehow only Salido's low blows have to be criticized and be taken into consideration according to some irrational fanboys and ******s here whilst Lomachenko's fouls should be totally ignored and be forgiven?
Questions for such irrational individuals and fan boys:
1) What right do you have of even mentioning Orlando Salido's fouls (low blows) without also mentioning Vasyl Lomachenko's equally critical fouls (excessive clinching)?
2) Why should it be acceptable for Vasyl Lomachenko to foul with excessive clinching but not Orlando salido with low blows?
Questions for such irrational individuals and fan boys:
1) What right do you have of even mentioning Orlando Salido's fouls (low blows) without also mentioning Vasyl Lomachenko's equally critical fouls (excessive clinching)?
2) Why should it be acceptable for Vasyl Lomachenko to foul with excessive clinching but not Orlando salido with low blows?
Comment