Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Hearn: If Parker Beats Joshua - He Makes a Fortune in Rematch

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    Originally posted by sportbuddha View Post
    Not sure where all this confidence in Parker comes from, I’ve watched all his major fights and haven’t seen him look good once. Whyte and Parker is actually a great match up imho and you could argue that Helenius and Chisora are as good as anyone Parker has fought and of course we know he went rounds with AJ, we don’t know if Parker can yet.
    That's the ******est comment of the year.

    Chisora just lost to a euro bum nobody and whyte almost died fighting Chisora. Proves how bad he is.

    Helenius had 5 days prep for the whyte fight and was competely gassed for 9 of the rounds. And Whyte still couldn't hit him.

    Whyte had proven himself to be competely void of talent in his last 2 fights. He is a C grade domestic level at best.

    Another Uk hype job that gets exposed every time he fights

    Comment


    • #12
      Originally posted by Jkp View Post
      That's the ******est comment of the year.

      Chisora just lost to a euro bum nobody and whyte almost died fighting Chisora. Proves how bad he is.

      Helenius had 5 days prep for the whyte fight and was competely gassed for 9 of the rounds. And Whyte still couldn't hit him.

      Whyte had proven himself to be competely void of talent in his last 2 fights. He is a C grade domestic level at best.

      Another Uk hype job that gets exposed every time he fights
      Lol...****** post of the year, whatever...you still couldn't justify your point on why Parker is good, what his labouring borefest against Fury or maybe it was the hard work he made of Ruiz impressed you? You go on backing the kid I couldn't care less, he's fought no one and still looked cruddy the whole time, have you any idea how low level all his opponents were until he fought until he met Takam? The Pacific region calibre is just terrible, he's a big fish in a very small pond
      Last edited by sportbuddha; 01-01-2018, 10:10 PM.

      Comment


      • #13
        Originally posted by sportbuddha View Post
        Lol...****** post of the year, whatever...you still couldn't justify your point on why Parker is good, what his labouring borefest against Fury or maybe it was the hard work he made of Ruiz impressed you? You go on backing the kid I couldn't care less, he's fought no one and still looked cruddy the whole time, have you any idea how low level all his opponents were until he fought until he met Takam? The Pacific region calibre is just terrible, he's a big fish in a very small pond
        What??? I never said parker was good. But he is clearly a level above Whyte and Brezeale who are garbage.

        Please read the posts properly before ranting unnecessarily.

        Comment


        • #14
          How? We still don't know how that win will be , what if Parker destroy him in 3 round why would we want a rematch?

          Comment


          • #15
            Originally posted by Jkp View Post
            What??? I never said parker was good. But he is clearly a level above Whyte and Brezeale who are garbage.

            Please read the posts properly before ranting unnecessarily.

            That image trying to discredit Joshua's wins and level of opposition is a total joke. For starters, why would opponents in his first 10 pro fights be highly ranked? That would just be ****** and unnecessary risk. That's how you ruin prospects and potential elite level young pros. And Wilder's leftovers? That also proves nothing. Gavern and Molina, #11 and #18 for Joshua, were #32 and #34 for Wilder and he had trouble with Molina who was demolished by Joshua. Sorry to burst your bubble but maybe you should try harder next time or better yet, educate yourself and take a look at Wilder's first 20 opponents and try to find a fighter who is, or ever has been, remotely relevant in the heavyweight division

            Comment


            • #16
              Originally posted by theface07 View Post
              That image trying to discredit Joshua's wins and level of opposition is a total joke. For starters, why would opponents in his first 10 pro fights be highly ranked? That would just be ****** and unnecessary risk. That's how you ruin prospects and potential elite level young pros. And Wilder's leftovers? That also proves nothing. Gavern and Molina, #11 and #18 for Joshua, were #32 and #34 for Wilder and he had trouble with Molina who was demolished by Joshua. Sorry to burst your bubble but maybe you should try harder next time or better yet, educate yourself and take a look at Wilder's first 20 opponents and try to find a fighter who is, or ever has been, remotely relevant in the heavyweight division
              Agree, Wilder has a rubbish resume as well as AJ.

              Comment


              • #17
                Originally posted by Jkp View Post
                What??? I never said parker was good. But he is clearly a level above Whyte and Brezeale who are garbage.

                Please read the posts properly before ranting unnecessarily.

                That is the relevance of my post (rant), the context was my view that Whyte and Parker are at similar levels. By defending Parker the inference is that he is good and Whyte is bad. Perhaps what you were saying (which I did misread) was that Parker is bad and Whyte is worse. If thats the case, then fair enough, I get ya.

                Comment


                • #18
                  Hughie Fury, Andy Ruiz and Carlos Takam would all beat Whyte IMO.

                  I'm not sure why Hughie Fury didn't jump at that chance to fight Whyte. It's a perfect style match up for him against a (supposedly) credible opponent that would get him straight back in the ring after his loss.

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X
                  TOP