Comments Thread For: Wilder Rejects Claim He's Pricing Himself Out For Joshua Bout

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Robbie Barrett
    Banned
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Nov 2013
    • 40891
    • 2,779
    • 667
    • 570,921

    #41
    Originally posted by harwri008
    Ok, now you lost me. If he don't deserve it then why are they giving it to him. You're telling me Wilder is not a bigger name than Parker?
    I'm telling you that Joshua is overpaying Parker he doesn't deserve 30+ percent and neither does Wilder. Parker is getting it because Joshua is being generous and Wilder will too if it happens.

    Comment

    • Robbie Barrett
      Banned
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Nov 2013
      • 40891
      • 2,779
      • 667
      • 570,921

      #42
      Originally posted by STREET CLEANER
      Make the math for the total purse. Don't spin it
      We don't know what the total purse was for Joshua.

      Comment

      • Robbie Barrett
        Banned
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Nov 2013
        • 40891
        • 2,779
        • 667
        • 570,921

        #43
        Originally posted by Patsfan bri
        I do blame Hearn. I`m done . See ya midget **** or should I say midget brain ? I will go with both.
        See you ******. After embarrassing yourself you run away.

        Comment

        • j.razor
          Undisputed Champion
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Jun 2007
          • 23786
          • 265
          • 0
          • 227,586,034

          #44
          Originally posted by redmish
          Americans don't buy PPVs anymore. 1 million buys is considered a success in the US now. Apart from the Floyd vs McGregor freak show that is. Do you think this fight does 1 million over there?
          1 mil was always considered a success, then & now.

          Comment

          • HarvardBlue
            Undisputed Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Nov 2011
            • 6762
            • 224
            • 128
            • 41,455

            #45
            Originally posted by Robbie Barrett
            I'm telling you that Joshua is overpaying Parker he doesn't deserve 30+ percent and neither does Wilder. Parker is getting it because Joshua is being generous and Wilder will too if it happens.
            You're not answering the question. Is Wilder a bigger name than Parker?

            Comment

            • j.razor
              Undisputed Champion
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Jun 2007
              • 23786
              • 265
              • 0
              • 227,586,034

              #46
              Originally posted by Robbie Barrett
              I'm telling you that Joshua is overpaying Parker he doesn't deserve 30+ percent and neither does Wilder. Parker is getting it because Joshua is being generous and Wilder will too if it happens.
              Well D.Wilder is better than parker so let AJ be generous again & make this fight happen, 60/40. LOL

              Comment

              • Ray*
                Be safe!!!
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Jul 2005
                • 44867
                • 1,654
                • 1,608
                • 558,890

                #47
                The funny thing i kept reading is "The old man Wlad Klit" was 40 or 41 years old coming off 15 months lay off when Joshua fought him.

                That old man was 32 years old when Wilder turned pro, nine years later he never fought him because he was never ready, Joshua who turned pro in 2013 and with few fights has fought better opponents that the 40 odd fights that Wilder has been in.

                He already too a risk by fighting that old man even though he had less experience than Wlad/Fury or Wilder going into the fight. So to shamelessly claimed AJ fought an old man whilst ignoring the fact that in 9 years as a pro Wilder didn't fight that old man makes it all laughable.

                Comment

                • MisanthropicNY
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Jul 2014
                  • 7680
                  • 288
                  • 6
                  • 37,612

                  #48
                  There are a lot of Beyonce fan boys who seem to not realize that Hearn is a PROMOTER and Haymon is a MANAGER.

                  Haymon is getting a huge back end cut of Beyonce's paycheck, so obviously Haymon is the one behind the 50/50 demand. Beyonce was ready to get on his knees and suck a Russian cack for $4.5 mil and let the guy do steroids and everything - that's how desperate Beyonce is to fight washed up 37 year old bums - sound like a familiar description to the same guy he's fighting now?

                  There is 0 chance this fight happens in the US... the fight will be televised from the UK at a friendly-US PPV buy time - the UFC has already established how to do it... You think Hearn would risk a first-timer on PPV and risk staging the fight on a whim and a chance that Wilder can sell the fight in the US?

                  Get ready for Calzaghe vs Jeff Lacy - the heavyweight version in the UK, Biotches.

                  Comment

                  • Robbie Barrett
                    Banned
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Nov 2013
                    • 40891
                    • 2,779
                    • 667
                    • 570,921

                    #49
                    Originally posted by harwri008
                    You're not answering the question. Is Wilder a bigger name than Parker?
                    I have no time for you trying to spin it. Saying Wilder deserves more than Parker means nothing because Parker is being overpaid.


                    That's like a charity demanding money because you donated to another charity.

                    Comment

                    • Boxing Logic
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • May 2016
                      • 4049
                      • 442
                      • 65
                      • 59,061

                      #50
                      No one cares. Go away. Stop ruining boxing. Leave to sport to the boxers who actually want to be great and forge real legacies, rather than waiting in the weeds for the perfect time to try to pick off one or two good but not great wins and then, if you can even win those fights, brag and exaggerate them over and over again until you brainwash enough idiots into thinking you're great that you can halfway manufacture a "great" legacy for yourself, so that you can rake in some money from the most gullible people out there, which is really what you care about much more in the first place, all while denying shots at the prominent spot in your division that was gifted to you because of politics, not merit, to the boxers who actually deserve it and are actually willing to fight the best consistently which is what true greatness in boxing requires.

                      Edit: something about my grammar and sentence structure in this post reminds me of Deontay Wilder's technique, punch selection, and rhythm in the ring. Huh.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP