Can someone explain to aboutfkntime

[GGG Gloveking]

all I can say is, that you have utterly embarrassed yourself

you know little/nothing about boxing, I wonder why you are even here

you show no willingness to learn, and seem fixated with trying to get your pacifist client off on a technicality

a technicality that is utter nonsense to anyone knowledgable. or even keenly interested

you are an absolute excuse-making muppet..... and you have embarrassed yourself with your own ******ity.....

let's leave it there kid..... because, whilst you have been willing to fluff yourself up like a pea****, you have not been willing to be honest enough to answer a simple, reasonable, LOGICAL, question.....

You're the one trying to get your client off on a technicality talking about he wasn't a "genuine middleweight ". Regardless of he was a genuine middleweight or not, he was a middleweight champion, and should be expected to defend the middleweight championship in middleweight fashion. You're trying to make excuses for a middleweight champion.

You keep wanting to bring up Kell Brook. How many middleweight belts did he have?

[TonyGe]

this is not the " Can someone explain to aboutfkntime " thread

this is the "let's find out who the casuals are, and embarrass them" thread

Go look into a mirror if you want to see a casual fan. You have no concept of the rules of boxing, styles or all the other things you claim to be an expert in. You refuse to acknowledge that Canelo played a weight game for years, dodged Golovkin by giving up his belt, lost the Golovkin fight by going to the ropes trying to imitate his idol Floyd. You have zero clue on the importance of the jab and it counts as a punch. Don't understand that a fighter can't give up the majority of a round and then land punches that have very little effect on his opponent and expect to win. You have no clue that Golovkin outpointed him on the ropes by taking power off his punches scoring and keeping him there. Canelo was made to look ****** in that fight and rightfully so. He might win a rematch but his stamina and ring IQ have to improve and Golovkin has to slip, in order for that to happen.

[Real King Kong]

answer the question muppet.....





..... oh, and while you clowns are running around the room looking for an answer to that logical/reasonable question..... don't wake up the elephant, willya

Lol I don't know what point you think you have...seems like you just keep asking dumb questions over and over to avoid admitting your ******ity.

Brook was a ww moving up for 1 fight to face ggg...could that possibly be why ggg said he's not a mw? Do you think Canelo and brook are the same size or something?

[aboutfkntime]

You have made the statement that Canelo is not a genuine middleweight?

Yet you have offered up nothing to support your view?

How do you think Golovkin saying Brook is not a middleweight make Canelo not be?

I've asked you for the criteria what it is to be a middleweight or any boxing weight class, so we can examine if your theory hold water.


At this moment, your stance is, I think this and then putting your fingers in your ears and ignoring everything.

That is why I asked about if you finished high school as it seems you may have mental deficiencies?

Are you on the autistic spectrum?

kid..... ANSWER THE QUESTIONS YOU MUPPET !!!


you know.... the REASONABLE/LOGICAL questions below


EVERYBODY can see that you ducking me, b1tch..... so be a good professor, and do your homework



1)why is The Scotsman's Fallacy relevant ?

2) why did Golovkin say this about 159lb Kell Brook immediately following their fight.....
" he is not a middleweight, He just isn't " ~ Golovkin

3) why have you not fed the elephant ?





Professor, why are you no longer interested in The Scotsman's Fallacy? looool

[aboutfkntime]

You're the one trying to get your client off on a technicality talking about he wasn't a "genuine middleweight ". Regardless of he was a genuine middleweight or not, he was a middleweight champion, and should be expected to defend the middleweight championship in middleweight fashion. You're trying to make excuses for a middleweight champion.

You keep wanting to bring up Kell Brook. How many middleweight belts did he have?

1) YOU are saying that Brook is a MW because he weighed 159

2) I am asking you to answer the following question.....

why did Golovkin say this about 159lb Kell Brook immediately following their fight.....
" he is not a middleweight, He just isn't " ~ Golovkin

stop ducking the question, golovb1tch

[aboutfkntime]

Go look into a mirror if you want to see a casual fan. You have no concept of the rules of boxing, styles or all the other things you claim to be an expert in. You refuse to acknowledge that Canelo played a weight game for years, dodged Golovkin by giving up his belt, lost the Golovkin fight by going to the ropes trying to imitate his idol Floyd. You have zero clue on the importance of the jab and it counts as a punch. Don't understand that a fighter can't give up the majority of a round and then land punches that have very little effect on his opponent and expect to win. You have no clue that Golovkin outpointed him on the ropes by taking power off his punches scoring and keeping him there. Canelo was made to look ****** in that fight and rightfully so. He might win a rematch but his stamina and ring IQ have to improve and Golovkin has to slip, in order for that to happen.

1) why were you unaware that Canelo weighed 150 at welter?

2) why were you unaware that Canelo won the WBO jmw title AT 154 by beating Liam Smith about a year ago?

3) why were you unaware that Reynoso has explained exactly why they are weight-diva's on MULTIPLE occasions?

4) the most important question..... if you were unaware of those RELEVANT facts, then why are you here running your ****-warmer??????

5) why can you not answer a simple question.....

why did Golovkin say this about 159lb Kell Brook immediately following their fight.....
" he is not a middleweight, He just isn't " ~ Golovkin

[D4thincarnation]

no, this conversationg is going nowhere because.....

1) you are nothing but an excuse-making muppet

2) we are still waiting for you to provide a reason for suggesting that I research The Scotsman's Fallacy..... so we can get to the point

waiting for you to stop answering a question, with a question.....



and waiting for you to feed the elephant.....

I thought it was obvious, as you are using that fallacy to say Canelo is not a "genuine" middleweight

What is your basis for this argument?

You must define what genuine means.

You must also set out your criteria for what a middleweight is and what makes a boxer his weight class?

You that done none of this.

Your arguments is of a standard a a child, just repeating your view over and over again, with zero to back it up.

Are you aware of this?

Does this even make sense to you?

Let me know what you are struggling with, and maybe I can help you to understand.

[aboutfkntime]

Lol I don't know what point you think you have...seems like you just keep asking dumb questions over and over to avoid admitting your ******ity.

Brook was a ww moving up for 1 fight to face ggg...could that possibly be why ggg said he's not a mw? Do you think Canelo and brook are the same size or something?

right..... so use THE EXACT SAME LOGIC for Canelo..... you excuse-making fanboy clown

he was OBVIOUSLY a JMW, fighting 1lb over the limit.....

which is why he made 154 for Smith.....

which is why lil'G refused to fight him at "middleweight"

which is why you ignorant excuse-making clowns have embarrassed yourselves protecting your pacifist girlfriend

[Shape up]

why are you spastics unable to answer a simple question ?

I mean, it should be no problem..... right ?

tell me why YOU think that Golovkin said this about 159lb Kell Brook immediately following their fight.....

" he is not a middleweight, He just isn't " ~ Golovkin

why do you guys always duck for cover whenever it gets a little difficult?

It means he was feather fisted, you know nothing about boxing, now answer why canelo and fishnets said 160 wasn't an issue after the khan fight them dropped the belt

[aboutfkntime]

I thought it was obvious, as you are using that fallacy to say Canelo is not a "genuine" middleweight

What is your basis for this argument?

You must define what genuine means.

You must also set out your criteria for what a middleweight is and what makes a boxer his weight class?

You that done none of this.

Your arguments is of a standard a a child, just repeating your view over and over again, with zero to back it up.

Are you aware of this?

Does this even make sense to you?

Let me know what you are struggling with, and maybe I can help you to understand.

right, Professor..... so, you ARE hung-up about the word "genuine "..... which is deliciously hilarious

1) why did you lie about that earlier ?

2) when you smartened up, and realized that I knew exactly what The Scotsman's Fallacy was..... did you fart loudly?

like I told you prof..... you are welcome to use the word "fake" anytime you want..... if you are not happy with the word genuine

and you asking me to explain to you what the word "genuine" means..... is a further embarrassment to your crumbling reputation

you are an absolute, excuse-making, MUPPET