Can someone explain to aboutfkntime

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • aboutfkntime
    Undisputed Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Feb 2015
    • 47366
    • 1,631
    • 3,563
    • 391,308

    #2171
    Originally posted by stealthradon
    Audio doesn't work and according to the quote he said nothing about 168.
    He said he could fight Canelo at 154, but not he would fight him for the middleweight there, because that's not where MW is.

    Ward could make 160, but he wouldn't.

    what do you mean, audio doesn't work.....

    what the fk don't you understand about this, you excuse-making muppet.....

    Golovkin made it clear that he would fight anyone from 154-168, including Andre Ward and Canelo Alvarez.

    "I feel HBO is pushing for me and Ward maybe next year, but I’m focused on Matthew Macklin. Ward needs time for rehab and I need to have a few more fights for super middleweights. Right now, I think he is probably the best fighter in the world but it’s still a few fights away. For me the two biggest fights are Andre ward and Canelo Alvarez because I’m at 165 and I can make middleweight and I can still make jr. middleweight."
    b,b,b,b,but..... you excuse-making clown

    Comment

    • aboutfkntime
      Undisputed Champion
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Feb 2015
      • 47366
      • 1,631
      • 3,563
      • 391,308

      #2172
      Originally posted by stealthradon
      What is the functional difference between 153.9 and 154.2?
      What is the functional difference between 153.9 and 154.3?
      What is the functional difference between 153.9 and 154.4?
      What is the functional difference between 153.9 and 154.5?
      What is the functional difference between 153.9 and 154.6?
      What is the functional difference between 153.9 and 154.7?
      What is the functional difference between 153.9 and 154.8?
      What is the functional difference between 153.9 and 154.9?
      What is the functional difference between 153.9 and 155.0?
      What is the functional difference between 153.9 and 155.1?
      What is the functional difference between 153.9 and 155.2?
      What is the functional difference between 153.9 and 155.3?
      What is the functional difference between 153.9 and 155.4?
      What is the functional difference between 153.9 and 155.5?
      What is the functional difference between 153.9 and 155.6?
      What is the functional difference between 153.9 and 155.7?
      What is the functional difference between 153.9 and 155.8?
      What is the functional difference between 153.9 and 155.9?
      What is the functional difference between 153.9 and 156.0?
      What is the functional difference between 153.9 and 156.1?
      What is the functional difference between 153.9 and 156.2?
      What is the functional difference between 153.9 and 156.3?
      What is the functional difference between 153.9 and 156.4?
      What is the functional difference between 153.9 and 156.5?
      What is the functional difference between 153.9 and 156.6?
      What is the functional difference between 153.9 and 156.7?
      What is the functional difference between 153.9 and 156.8?
      What is the functional difference between 153.9 and 156.9?
      What is the functional difference between 153.9 and 157.0?
      What is the functional difference between 153.9 and 157.1?
      What is the functional difference between 153.9 and 157.2?
      What is the functional difference between 153.9 and 157.3?
      What is the functional difference between 153.9 and 157.4?
      What is the functional difference between 153.9 and 157.5?
      What is the functional difference between 153.9 and 157.6?
      What is the functional difference between 153.9 and 157.7?
      What is the functional difference between 153.9 and 157.8?
      What is the functional difference between 153.9 and 157.9?
      What is the functional difference between 153.9 and 158.0?
      What is the functional difference between 153.9 and 158.1?
      What is the functional difference between 153.9 and 158.2?
      What is the functional difference between 153.9 and 158.3?
      What is the functional difference between 153.9 and 158.4?
      What is the functional difference between 153.9 and 158.5?
      What is the functional difference between 153.9 and 158.6?
      What is the functional difference between 153.9 and 158.7?
      What is the functional difference between 153.9 and 158.8?
      What is the functional difference between 153.9 and 158.9?
      What is the functional difference between 153.9 and 159.0?
      What is the functional difference between 153.9 and 159.1?
      What is the functional difference between 153.9 and 159.2?
      What is the functional difference between 153.9 and 159.3?
      What is the functional difference between 153.9 and 159.4?
      What is the functional difference between 153.9 and 159.5?
      What is the functional difference between 153.9 and 159.6?
      What is the functional difference between 153.9 and 159.7?
      What is the functional difference between 153.9 and 159.8?
      What is the functional difference between 153.9 and 159.9?
      What is the functional difference between 153.9 and 160.0?

      Where is the cut-off point?




      there is no cutoff, you ***wit..... middleweight is 160

      anything below that is a catchweight fight

      you have stated on multiple occasions that if a fighter weighs ANYTHING between 154-160, then he is a genuine middleweight..... which is childish nonsense

      words that follow " technically " in a sentence, are usually absolute rubbish

      so I asked you to explain the FUNCTIONAL difference between 153.9 and 154.1..... what changed?

      what FUNCTIONAL difference will that .2lbs make to a fighters performance?

      b,b,b,b,but.....

      fk you're an idiot for typing that HUGE, absurd, post lol

      Comment

      • aboutfkntime
        Undisputed Champion
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Feb 2015
        • 47366
        • 1,631
        • 3,563
        • 391,308

        #2173
        Originally posted by Shape up
        so in this post of yours sheep***er, you AGREE that 1lb gave canyellow an advantage but according to your other posts there is no difference between 154 and 155 you hypocrite, again you show how full of shlt you are sheep***er

        nope, I said there is little/no difference

        and then I asked you to explain the FUNCTIONAL difference between 153.9 and 154.1.....

        ..... but you shat the bed over that question..... just like Golovkin shat the bed over all of his "154-168" rubbish

        I even asked you that question a different way, so that you could not weasel out.....

        I asked you to explain exactly what difference .2lbs (the "technical" difference between JMW and MW) would make to a fighters performance.....

        but yea, you shat the bed, again

        you could answer that question now if you wish, along with these.....

        when you dumb fk's heard all of that "anyone from 154-168" nonsense..... who did YOU think he wanted to fight?..... if not Cotto Canelo Ward, then who..... Rosado? lol
        why did Golovkin totally refuse to negotiate on weight with SUPERSTARS..... despite the fact that he was willing to negotiate on weight with NO-HOPER'S?
        why did Golovkin say this..... " middleweight is 160 " ?



        tell you what, I will just add that question to the list

        Comment

        • Madison Boxing
          Banned
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Jul 2015
          • 35353
          • 6,447
          • 3,349
          • 190,590

          #2174
          Originally posted by aboutfkntime
          there is no cutoff, you ***wit..... middleweight is 160

          anything below that is a catchweight fight

          you have stated on multiple occasions that if a fighter weighs ANYTHING between 154-160, then he is a genuine middleweight..... which is childish nonsense

          words that follow " technically " in a sentence, are usually absolute rubbish

          so I asked you to explain the FUNCTIONAL difference between 153.9 and 154.1..... what changed?

          what FUNCTIONAL difference will that .2lbs make to a fighters performance?

          b,b,b,b,but.....

          fk you're an idiot for typing that HUGE, absurd, post lol
          Just hold your hands up and admit you were wrong. You've dragged his thread on for long enough now by being stubborn.

          Comment

          • aboutfkntime
            Undisputed Champion
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Feb 2015
            • 47366
            • 1,631
            • 3,563
            • 391,308

            #2175
            Originally posted by stealthradon
            Mayweather as said previously. Just like Ward would go to 160 to fight Mayweather, but not GGG

            ****-for-brains..... this is what you said


            Originally posted by stealthradon
            When? Where? Source

            Constantly repeating your claims does not make them true.

            this was my reply.....


            Golovkin Would Fight Ward at 168 and Canelo at 154.....



            LOOOOOL

            b,b,b,b,but.....

            Comment

            • aboutfkntime
              Undisputed Champion
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Feb 2015
              • 47366
              • 1,631
              • 3,563
              • 391,308

              #2176
              sooooo.....

              so, you guys blamed Ward..... you guys blamed Andre Ward, when lil'G refused to be a man of his word and face Ward at SMW

              o, k, then.....

              FACT: Golovkin was willing to fight Froch at 168
              FACT: Golovkin was willing to fight Chavez at 168
              FACT: Golovkin was willing to fight Jack at 168
              FACT: Golovkin was willing to fight Hopkins at 168
              FACT: Golovkin was willing to fight Chudinov at 168
              FACT: Golovkin was willing to fight Ramirez at 168
              FACT: Golovkin was NOT willing to fight Ward at 168


              well..... just so long as you are all happy with that

              Comment

              • aboutfkntime
                Undisputed Champion
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Feb 2015
                • 47366
                • 1,631
                • 3,563
                • 391,308

                #2177
                sooooo.....

                FACT: Hypekin specifically promised to fight Canelo at 154

                FACT: Hypekin stated that he is ready willing and able to fight at 154, but nobody will step up.....

                FACT: Hypekin would not dare step into the ring with 155lb Canelo

                well..... just so long as you are all happy with that as well lol


                Comment

                • aboutfkntime
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Feb 2015
                  • 47366
                  • 1,631
                  • 3,563
                  • 391,308

                  #2178
                  who the fk does Chickenkin want to fight ?

                  Comment

                  • aboutfkntime
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Feb 2015
                    • 47366
                    • 1,631
                    • 3,563
                    • 391,308

                    #2179
                    should we roll out Martinez for him ? loooool

                    Comment

                    • aboutfkntime
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Feb 2015
                      • 47366
                      • 1,631
                      • 3,563
                      • 391,308

                      #2180
                      Originally posted by aboutfkntime
                      one JMW, fighting another JMW, at 155.... is NOT a MW bout

                      this thread..... is the most ******ity that I have ever had to deal with in my life

                      it is actually hilarious

                      the fact that you bottom-feeders needed the quote above explained to you..... is deliciously hilarious

                      LOSERS !!!!!!!!!

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP