Originally posted by kafkod
View Post
I think that is absolute rubbish
back in the say, double-digit defences were impressive..... but not now
back in the say there were 8 titles, now there are more than 80..... every fcuker has one, big deal
also, he unified with Lemieux..... who is average at best
also, those defences are not legitimate..... the first 11 defences Golovkin made were for the WBA bullshht title..... regular/interim, whatever.....
even a tard realizes that you cannot have multiple WBA champions running around racking up title defences
it's just nonsense
bread is literally suggesting that Golovkin is HOF-worthy for lying to his fans, knocking out some cans, and going life and death with Canelo/Jacobs
this is Golovkin's legacy here, and it is NOT HOF-worthy
Weekend Review: Biggest Winners and Losers of 2017
By Michael Rosenthal
"Golovkin waited his entire career for big fights and then fell short when he got them, struggling to beat Danny Jacobs and settling for a draw with Alvarez".....
http://www.boxingscene.com/weekend-r...s-2017--123732
also, regarding Canelo.....
FACT: Golovkin was regarded as the man at 160
FACT: Golovkin has never entered the ring as an underdog
so..... Canelo has a better middleweight record than Golovkin, in his first fight at 160..... Golovkin's best result is an asterisk over Danny Jacobs..... but Canelo's best result is an asterisk over Golovkin
if Canelo beats Golovkin, then beats either Jacobs/Saunders..... he will have eclipsed Golovkin's entire career in 1 calendar year
Canelo > Golovkin..... in EVERY department
you fanboys would not know a good fighter if he punched you in the face
Comment