bad style for tarver

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • shortright
    Interim Champion
    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
    • Aug 2005
    • 584
    • 22
    • 0
    • 7,042

    #1

    bad style for tarver

    part of the reason he dominated and part of the reason he did good against jones was bad style match up and good style match up, tarvers not as bad as you think, plus b hop is better
  • Xcel
    I've been better than you
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Mar 2006
    • 1965
    • 159
    • 85
    • 8,488

    #2
    Originally posted by shortright
    part of the reason he dominated and part of the reason he did good against jones was bad style match up and good style match up, tarvers not as bad as you think, plus b hop is better
    No one said Tarver was a bum, but he is not A-List like he considers himself. He is now and forever a B-List fighter at best.

    Comment

    • psychopath
      Banned
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Aug 2004
      • 5085
      • 196
      • 266
      • 5,396

      #3
      Bhops will always be a bad style match up against anybody. Tarver is not that bad, Bhops simply made him look bad.

      Comment

      • Dirt E Gomez
        ***Stupendous***
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Jul 2005
        • 9976
        • 952
        • 1,092
        • 18,863

        #4
        Originally posted by psychopath
        Bhops will always be a bad style match up against anybody. Tarver is not that bad, Bhops simply made him look bad.
        Correct-amundo. People seldomly look good against Hops because of his fighting style and ability to impliment a game plan in the ring. That's half the reason I want to see Taylor vs Winky so much. I want to see what Taylor can do against an opponent who is still defense minded but not quite the counterpuncher Hop is. But I digress.

        Comment

        • joeytrimble
          zipper!
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Dec 2003
          • 3941
          • 123
          • 81
          • 10,484

          #5
          hopkins took a deadly trinidad and made him look like a toy

          Comment

          • Born to Win
            Contender
            Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
            • May 2006
            • 142
            • 16
            • 18
            • 6,431

            #6
            How come whenever somebody loses the "fans" rate him as a b-grade boxer?
            Lacy all of a sudden is only considered an unskilled puncher, Tarver is a never has been ... Both these guys I mentioned are world-class fighters. It's only that there always is someone who is just better.

            Comment

            • Da Iceman
              Banned
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Oct 2005
              • 5042
              • 133
              • 128
              • 10,394

              #7
              Originally posted by Born to Win
              How come whenever somebody loses the "fans" rate him as a b-grade boxer?
              Lacy all of a sudden is only considered an unskilled puncher, Tarver is a never has been ... Both these guys I mentioned are world-class fighters. It's only that there always is someone who is just better.
              its because tarver really is b grade fighter, and he beats washed up guys.

              Comment

              • psychopath
                Banned
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Aug 2004
                • 5085
                • 196
                • 266
                • 5,396

                #8
                Originally posted by Born to Win
                How come whenever somebody loses the "fans" rate him as a b-grade boxer?
                Lacy all of a sudden is only considered an unskilled puncher, Tarver is a never has been ... Both these guys I mentioned are world-class fighters. It's only that there always is someone who is just better.
                Exactly! That's what I'm saying. Tarver is not bad, Bhops simply made him look bad.

                People doesn't have to resort to ridiculing and degrading the losers. Somebody will always have somebody's number and beat them in that ring.

                Comment

                • DiegoFuego
                  Ask my dad, I'm GAY!
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Jan 2005
                  • 17338
                  • 1,403
                  • 586
                  • 24,657

                  #9
                  Hopkins is just a different breed. The way he beat Tarver last night was insane. Nobody predicted that other than JuicyJuice. I didn't consider it an upset that Hopkins won, but the way he won was out of this world. I think Tarver spent his months before the fight fighting the scales instead of training to fight the opponent. Not saying he would have won, but he looked like **** last night.

                  Comment

                  • psychopath
                    Banned
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Aug 2004
                    • 5085
                    • 196
                    • 266
                    • 5,396

                    #10
                    Originally posted by DiegoFuego
                    Hopkins is just a different breed. The way he beat Tarver last night was insane. Nobody predicted that other than JuicyJuice. I didn't consider it an upset that Hopkins won, but the way he won was out of this world. I think Tarver spent his months before the fight fighting the scales instead of training to fight the opponent. Not saying he would have won, but he looked like **** last night.
                    I have to agree that Bops really made a number on Tarver. But I'll attribute that to Bhops sleekness and smartness not to Tarver's suppose to be un preparedness.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP