Comments Thread For: Lomachenko to Mayweather: Stop Hiding Gervonta Davis From Me!

[j.razor]

I stay owning this guy. It's what I do.

You aint own ****. You keep losing & only cuz I went for Rigo you happy you won ONE....LOL

[pacmanis1]

I like a Tank but honestly Floyd should keep him away from Loma. I don’t know if Tank has the mental makeup to bounce back from the beating he’d take if they were to fight now. That could be a career ruiner there.

[P4Pdunny]

if Floyd know what's good for him he will keep tank far away from this guy

[j.razor]

Because both are above average fighters and Davis wouldn't lay a glove on that version Loma and would just get peppered from every angle and outclassed badly. He's the new Broner.

I'll say this though. Sosa has a FAR better resume than Tank.

You have to win to have a better resume.

[j.razor]

So Tank can showboat and Loma can't?

Your agenda is clear.

You just showed your card cuz I never said loma can't showboat.

[chrisJS]

You aint own ****. You keep losing & only cuz I went for Rigo you happy you won ONE....LOL

Oh but here's where your wrong.

http://www.boxingscene.com/mayweather-i-view-miguel-cotto-being-undefeated--50111

"You have a guy Miguel Cotto. He has two losses, but one of his losses is to a guy at a catch-weight, where he wasn't 100%. And you have another loss to a guy who was caught cheating in the sport. I'm looking ahead that I'm facing a guy who's undefeated," Mayweather said.
"He faced Antonio Margarito, a guy who everybody said I was scared of, and he got caught cheating. Now you got Manny Pacquiao, a guy who fought Miguel Cotto at a catch-weight. So you have one guy who cheating and one guy who fought at a catch-weight. I wanted to fight Miguel Cotto at 154 because I wanted to fight the best Miguel Cotto."

You ****ing liar. So your a liar and make lies and agendas based on racist views. I just proved you WRONG AGAIN.

Another "W' for me

Don't duck this and explain your lies. I am intrigued to see what you say about this. I'm predicting another excuses just as I predicted an easy win for Loma where you predicted an easy win for Rigo and I correctly predicted you'd cry, front and discredit the fight beyond reason. I won that one too.

Why didn't you respond to this? That's another clear W for me as I proved your "point" was a blatant lie just as I did with Regulus/Kigali yesterday when he admitted that I got him with a fact and exposed his lying.

[mcdonalds]

Yeah because Floyd didn't have the guts to step up.

LOL loma lost to salido when he was like 26 years old. Floyd at 26 wouldve dominated him

[chrisJS]

You have to win to have a better resume.

A win over Fortuna is far better than anything on Tank's "resume". At least Sosa had the guts to fight some good guys too.

[chrisJS]

LOL loma lost to salido when he was like 26 years old. Floyd at 26 wouldve dominated him

At 2 fights he probably wouldn't though. He also probably wouldn't fight Russell at 3 fights or Walters at 7 fights or Rigo at 11 fights.

When Floyd was 25 and around 30 fights into his career he relied on a gift against Castilo. Loma at 11 fights doesn't struggle with guys that caliber.

[j.razor]

What is 50-0 when he never fought an elite in their prime? Never fought the best at their best! Smoke and mirrors. In the words of PT Barnum...there's a sucker born every minute.

You believe all the comments from boxingscene & youtube?