Charlo beats trout and williams..suddenly best at 160?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • jmrf4435
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Jun 2014
    • 8397
    • 772
    • 14
    • 66,112

    #1

    Charlo beats trout and williams..suddenly best at 160?

    Where is the logic in this stuff?

    Saunders Dominates a live dawg and KO artist in lemeuix, but charlos win over old man austin trout has him as the biggest contender in the division.
  • Beercules
    Lounge POTY '17
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Aug 2013
    • 65186
    • 4,941
    • 7,203
    • 950,179

    #2
    I don't get it either. Oh well.

    Comment

    • turnedup
      Boxing fan since 1985
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Sep 2012
      • 10387
      • 1,936
      • 585
      • 53,504

      #3
      Let the bandwagon hoppers have something to ride for a bit. Same folks who rode with Gary Russell, Qullin, and Broner before they actually did jack shhh in the sport and when they lost their step ups they moved on to the next.

      Comment

      • lolpz
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Jun 2011
        • 2694
        • 148
        • 40
        • 42,305

        #4
        Who said Charlo was the best in the division? What are you guys talking about?

        Comment

        • jmrf4435
          Undisputed Champion
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Jun 2014
          • 8397
          • 772
          • 14
          • 66,112

          #5
          Originally posted by lolpz
          Who said Charlo was the best in the division? What are you guys talking about?
          I;m seeing it a lot on this board.

          **** like "charlo is the best in the division but saunders ill prob get a shot at GGG first"

          Charlo has fought scrubs for the most part

          Comment

          • Mammoth
            Undisputed Champion
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Sep 2016
            • 35717
            • 3,848
            • 3,389
            • 378,304

            #6
            Trout would probably beat Lemieux

            Comment

            • jmrf4435
              Undisputed Champion
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Jun 2014
              • 8397
              • 772
              • 14
              • 66,112

              #7
              Originally posted by turnedup
              Let the bandwagon hoppers have something to ride for a bit. Same folks who rode with Gary Russell, Qullin, and Broner before they actually did jack shhh in the sport and when they lost their step ups they moved on to the next.
              And the same people are completely discrediting sunders win over lemeuix.

              Lemuix is twice as good as anyone Charlo has been in with

              Comment

              • jmrf4435
                Undisputed Champion
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Jun 2014
                • 8397
                • 772
                • 14
                • 66,112

                #8
                Originally posted by Mammoth
                Trout would probably beat Lemieux
                trout was long done and still gave a good account of himself against charlo/

                Not to mention how undersized he was.

                Trout was journeymen status when Charlo fought him

                Comment

                • Mammoth
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Sep 2016
                  • 35717
                  • 3,848
                  • 3,389
                  • 378,304

                  #9
                  Originally posted by jmrf4435
                  trout was long done and still gave a good account of himself against charlo/

                  Not to mention how undersized he was.

                  Trout was journeymen status when Charlo fought him
                  Trout would beat Alcine even

                  Comment

                  • lolpz
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Jun 2011
                    • 2694
                    • 148
                    • 40
                    • 42,305

                    #10
                    Originally posted by jmrf4435
                    I;m seeing it a lot on this board.

                    **** like "charlo is the best in the division but saunders ill prob get a shot at GGG first"

                    Charlo has fought scrubs for the most part
                    That's really weird lol, all Charlo did was fight a mandatory but he hasn't proven himself.

                    The only proven guys at 160 right now are Canelo, GGG, Jacobs, and then I'll be nice enough to throw Saunders in there. The rest need to fight each other.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP