golovkins my boy but i dont think anyone can argue with lomachenko as p4p number 1. Obviously his wins are now being revised, trashed and discredited but gary russell, nicolas walters and rigondeaux were all considered world class fighters (rigondeaux considered a p4p level fighter) and lomachenko took them to school. And as for crawford are people gonna tell me burns, postol and indongo are better than them 3? Know apparantly im some hardcore racist whos bias and hates crawford but im willing to listen to reason, can someone tell me how someone with 0 world class wins should be rated more highly than someone with 3?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: The Argument For (And Against) Lomachenko Being #1 P4P
Collapse
-
-
-
Loma is a f.ucking beast
For me with the retirement of Ward , right now there is no real #1 P4P
There's 3-5 guys ( Lomas right up there ) who could make a claim to the crown if things go their way in 2018 but right now it just seems no ones done enough
When Mayweather was fighting you couldn't deny he was #1, When he retired and Ward took over especially after he beat Kov you couldn't deny it
What fighter can we say that about right now
Comment
-
Originally posted by Shadoww702 View PostLet's not forget he fought the last 2 guys who were 1 & 2 weight classes SMALLER than him.
I've been looking at the 126 and 122 lbers to see who he fights next??? You have any ideas??? Maybe
Daniel Roman
Gary Russell Jr. again
Oscar Valdez
???
Haters gonna hate no matter what...say what you say, but loma has done enough to be one of the top three p4p...all of the boxing fans already know it after that performance vs rigo but you?
Omg, this clown really can give loma his credit...hahahaha
Comment
-
-
It's between Terence Crawford and Lomachenko right now.
Errol Spence can be in the conversation too if he beats Lamont Peterson and Keith Thurman.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Mr Objecitivity View PostWhilst we're at it, let Mikey Garcia fight Canelo Alvarez and let Terence Crawford fight Gennady Golovkin first?
Loma just fought a 48 year old who fought 3 rounds in the last 2 years. AND was 2 weight classea lower...
Comment
-
Originally posted by KaidouTheBeast View PostBuahahahahaha....
Haters gonna hate no matter what...say what you say, but loma has done enough to be one of the top three p4p...all of the boxing fans already know it after that performance vs rigo but you?
Omg, this clown really can give loma his credit...hahahaha
Comment
-
Originally posted by ShoulderRoll View PostIt's between Terence Crawford and Lomachenko right now.
Errol Spence can be in the conversation too if he beats Lamont Peterson and Keith Thurman.
But resume wise for now he should be #1.
Well see shortly who #1 is. Still have a lot of young GREAT boxers out there....
Comment
Comment