alright guys you gotta help me out. what fight should i oreder. i cant decide. do i want to see up and commers or do i want to see a legand try to make history. help me out please.
witch ppv should i buy?
Collapse
-
Though choice, depends on who you like the most, I'm going to a club and they're only showing the Hopkins fight -
I was just gonna start a thread asking the same thing. I need to know which undercard is better.
I'm leaning towards buying the Cotto-Paulie fight primarily because I dislike Tarver and Hopkins styles. Usually not a whole lot of leather getting exchanged. It's the much higher profile fight, but I can watch the replay next week. The Cotto fight is intriguing at least.
Can anyone give me the heads up on which undercard is the better of the two please?Comment
-
this has been asked a few times already over the last couple days, hopefully these links will answer some questions:
and here, just for urdaddyinAZ,
with Tarver-Hopkins you're getting:
Antonio Tarver vs. Bernard Hopkins, light heavyweights
Co-feature: Israel Vazquez vs. Ivan Hernandez for Vazquez' WBC super bantamweight title
Special attraction: Hector Camacho, Jr. vs. Andrey Tsurkan for the vacant NABF junior middleweight title
Undercard: Jorge Paez, Jr. vs. Travis Hartman, junior welterweights
whereas, if you get Cotto-Paulie you're getting:
Miguel Angel Cotto vs. Paul Malignaggi for Cotto's WBO junior welterweight title
John Duddy vs. Alfredo Cuevas for Duddy's WBC continental americas middleweight title
Undercard: Bobby Pacquiao vs. Kevin Kelley, super featherweights
Julio Cesar Chavez, Jr. vs. Aaron Drake, junior welterweights
Juan Manuel Lopez vs. Sergio Mendez, featherweights
Special attraction: pro debut of Notre Dame football player Tom Zbikowski vs. Robert Bell, heavyweights
it's a no-brainer which one to spend $$$ on if you're only buying one, Cotto-Malignaggi... but that's just my opinion.Comment
-
I'd probably pick Hopkins Tarver because I'm a Hopkins supporter, but I'd be pissed if it was a slow ass fight. Tarver keeps talking as if he's going to be agressive. Hopefully that isn't just talk.
If Bernard or Antonio is one of ur favorite fighters than I'd say buy it. If not then buy Cotto and Malignaggi.Comment
-
Originally posted by restless_438this has been asked a few times already over the last couple days, hopefully these links will answer some questions:
and here, just for urdaddyinAZ,
with Tarver-Hopkins you're getting:
Antonio Tarver vs. Bernard Hopkins, light heavyweights
Co-feature: Israel Vazquez vs. Ivan Hernandez for Vazquez' WBC super bantamweight title
Special attraction: Hector Camacho, Jr. vs. Andrey Tsurkan for the vacant NABF junior middleweight title
Undercard: Jorge Paez, Jr. vs. Travis Hartman, junior welterweights
whereas, if you get Cotto-Paulie you're getting:
Miguel Angel Cotto vs. Paul Malignaggi for Cotto's WBO junior welterweight title
John Duddy vs. Alfredo Cuevas for Duddy's WBC continental americas middleweight title
Undercard: Bobby Pacquiao vs. Kevin Kelley, super featherweights
Julio Cesar Chavez, Jr. vs. Aaron Drake, junior welterweights
Juan Manuel Lopez vs. Sergio Mendez, featherweights
Special attraction: pro debut of Notre Dame football player Tom Zbikowski vs. Robert Bell, heavyweights
it's a no-brainer which one to spend $$$ on if you're only buying one, Cotto-Malignaggi... but that's just my opinion.
Thanks a lot man!Comment
-
well putOriginally posted by Mayweather90I'd probably pick Hopkins Tarver because I'm a Hopkins supporter, but I'd be pissed if it was a slow ass fight. Tarver keeps talking as if he's going to be agressive. Hopefully that isn't just talk.
If Bernard or Antonio is one of ur favorite fighters than I'd say buy it. If not then buy Cotto and Malignaggi.
. ..Comment
Comment