The Quitting Spree of Kell Brook.. Next fight, third quit?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • FlatLine
    Lights out.
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • May 2012
    • 5727
    • 315
    • 116
    • 36,496

    #1

    The Quitting Spree of Kell Brook.. Next fight, third quit?

    Just a simple poll to decide if you believe Brook will quit for the third time in a row? Brook's quitting spree has persisted for over a year now against GGG and Spence, back to back and, with a 71% KO ratio, is Rabchenko equipped to make Brook quit once again, or will Brook be defensively sound enough to avoid getting hit with any damaging shots to his post-surgery orbital bone? Quit or no quit?
    6
    Yes - Brook will quit
    83.33%
    5
    No - Brook won't quit
    0.00%
    0
    Unsure / Undecided
    16.67%
    1
  • Madison Boxing
    Banned
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Jul 2015
    • 35364
    • 6,455
    • 3,367
    • 190,590

    #2
    easier said than done fighting with a broken eye socket mate.

    Comment

    • mlac
      Undisputed Champion
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Feb 2014
      • 20338
      • 1,630
      • 1,487
      • 210,093

      #3
      Brook is a warrior who went toe to toe with golovkin after moving up 2 weight divisions agaisnt a p4p fighter and gets no credit. just accused of quitting and cashing out.
      had a legit injury

      whereas rigo puts up a pathetic display, not worthy of being paid, quits and cashes out and is widely praised for ' moving up 2 weight divsions and against a p4p fighter, dare to be great'.
      had no injury.

      double standard ******s

      Comment

      • Redd Foxx
        Hittin' the heavy bag.
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Dec 2011
        • 22007
        • 1,180
        • 2,316
        • 1,257,197

        #4
        Gotta give him credit for going hard in the Golovkin fight. He didn't seem like he would have chosen to quit. He got pulled out. The last one, that was a quit.

        Comment

        • Lester Tutor
          Banned
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • May 2015
          • 17673
          • 365
          • 253
          • 22,224

          #5
          Last edited by Lester Tutor; 12-12-2017, 04:16 PM.

          Comment

          • redmish
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Dec 2010
            • 2704
            • 84
            • 1
            • 31,461

            #6
            There's no shame in losing to either GGG or Spence. He didn't have to fight them either, he chose to. More fighters should be like that.

            Comment

            • RJJ-94-02=GOAT
              Undisputed Champion
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Oct 2017
              • 28919
              • 9,234
              • 2,042
              • 246,831

              #7
              Originally posted by mlac
              Brook is a warrior who went toe to toe with golovkin after moving up 2 weight divisions agaisnt a p4p fighter and gets no credit. just accused of quitting and cashing out.
              had a legit injury

              whereas rigo puts up a pathetic display, not worthy of being paid, quits and cashes out and is widely praised for ' moving up 2 weight divsions and against a p4p fighter, dare to be great'.
              had no injury.

              double standard ******s
              Both deserve credit for taking the fights. Neither deserve credit for their performance’s in them or the following fight in Brooks case.
              Rigo blatantly quit against Loma and Brook blatantly quit against Spence.

              Comment

              • Sir_Didymus
                Interim Champion
                • Feb 2017
                • 870
                • 65
                • 9
                • 10,398

                #8
                Bloody hell you guys are giving Rabchenkos K.O ratio far too much credit. He's only fought like 6-7 times I think since 2013, split decision loss to Mundine, TKO loss to Tony Harrison who keeps calling Brook and Hearn out on Twitter and more importantly just look at what kind of boxers he got his K.O ratio from.

                I know once a QUITTER always a QUITTER but just because Rabchenko has "chenko" in his name doesn't mean he's going to become No-Mas-Rabchenko overnight.

                The guy can hardly move well for a boxer. Mundine took the fight out of him and he's not been the same since that war.

                I was wondering why Hatton was down at the Ingle gym a few weeks ago. Now I know why. I won't say fix but it sure does look like they're turning Rabchenko into fodder whilst he gets a decent payday for someone of his calibre. Brook should win this comfortably. If he struggles to a close decision...it's more or less over for the kid.

                Comment

                • W1LL
                  Celtic Warrior
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Dec 2004
                  • 11851
                  • 845
                  • 916
                  • 71,119

                  #9
                  Brook lost to the best Middleweight out there, then the best Welterweight out there. I don't think Sergey Rabchenko is the best Super Welterweight.

                  Comment

                  • Sir_Didymus
                    Interim Champion
                    • Feb 2017
                    • 870
                    • 65
                    • 9
                    • 10,398

                    #10
                    Originally posted by RJJ-94-02=GOAT
                    Both deserve credit for taking the fights. Neither deserve credit for their performance’s in them or the following fight in Brooks case.
                    Rigo blatantly quit against Loma and Brook blatantly quit against Spence.
                    At least the QUITTERS are in good company LOL!

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP