There's no clear #1 p4p between GGG, Crawford and Lomachenko

[boliodogs]

I agree there is no clear winner. I voted for Loma for now. If GGG looks terrific against Canelo I might put him back at number 1 where he was on my list before Loma fought so well against Rigo. .Crawford is a great fighter who easily beat the boxers he was supposed to beat. He fought everyone he should have so I can see why many rate him number. He is clearly the best at 140. He is a welterweight now so I have to judge him pfp as I welterweight. I think Spence would beat him so I have Loma 1st, GGG 2nd Spence 3rd and Crawford 4th. On resume Crawford might be number one as he has done a lot. But PFP is who you think is the better fighter right now for their weight class. I think Spence is a slightly better welterweight than Crawford.

[GhostofDempsey]

Good post. All three are worthy candidates for #1 spot, but I think Loma distanced himself slightly ahead of the others. GGG got jobbed and came out with a draw, while Crawford unified a division against very weak opposition. Loma just beat the man who a lot of writers and networks had as a P4P great. Despite the weight class debate, Loma basically played with Rigo like a chew toy. Made his last four opponents quit, no one has ever done that.

[HI-TECH Boxing]

I agree.. he named someone called poletinko ( I think) said he would make Loma look like a kid

That’s what he was saying the guy is going to get a gold
Medal first and he’s undefeated in amateurs

I follow amateur boxing closely and I've never heard of anyone called Poletinko.
That name doesn't even sound real. I won't be shocked if that guy was trolling.

It would be interesting to see an amateur boxer that is supposedly that good.

[Citizen Koba]

OK bro! Any chance you are from Russia or Ukraine?

Helleno-Anglic mate but my old man was a communist and a huge Russophile... some of it rubbed off.

[BrometheusBob.]

Personally I like Loma as the #1.

But I can understand how it is possible for people to have reasonable alternative picks for the #1 spot.

[Real King Kong]

loma and Crawford are similar cases...suddenly when it's a fighter you like, the eye test is legit and the resume doesn't have to full of elite wins. I think a 140-147lb loma beats Crawford...so I guess I'd have to go with loma, even tho it doesn't really feel right considering how few fights he's had.

[Mike_R]

For those 3 I got it

Bud
Loma
GGG

But for a full top 5 or 10 there are other guys to work in obvs.

[jmrf4435]

WHat seperates loma is the way he is beating top tier competition.

He's humiliating PFP fighters. GGG had 2 close fights that he won, but he's not obliterating guys anymore

Crawford needs a bigger win to be top 3, I;m sorry. Postol doesn't cut it

[VG_Addict]

Lomachenko and Crawford are both better than Golovkin.

I don't know why people think Golovkin is #1 P4P when he's clearly not.

[ramses07]

Loma made rigo quit

GGG drew with canelo (canelo made him look bad)