Terence Crawford is more skilled than Vasyl Lomachenko (without weight being factor)

[soul_survivor]

I agree that Crawford is more skilled i.e. he has more facets to his game BUT not significantly so. That is a ridiculous statement by someone who is clearly a troll.

[Red Bull]

"Until Loma beats Crowford he should never be ranked ahead of Crowford". What a ridiculous statement!
Now imagine if Joshua beats Parker & Wilders & Fury and become p4p#1 then by your logic Crowford should never be p4p#1 until he beats Joshua!! Isn't your logic flawed??

[Jsmooth9876]

LOMACHENKO has the best all around defensive and offense skills. Crawford has better attributes like power and reach and stuff but skill is a different thing.

[Madison Boxing]

Whos Crawford actually beat lol

[Fists_of_Fury]

Both Crawford and Lomachencko are vastly overrated in the skills department imo. How do you judge skill going off what you see them do against overmatched opponents? They both have yet to fight anyone good(A level)their own size or bigger but are hyped as p4p top guys. Loma got sonned by Salido . Crawford looked unimpressive and got buzzed by inactive and blown up Gamboa while having a massive size advantage. They are both hype jobs until they beat quality opponents their own size or bigger imo.

[Fists_of_Fury]

Whos Crawford actually beat lol

Who has either actually beat lol? Lomachencko does have a better resume than Crawford and Loma's resume is complete **** for a p4p top fighter.

[j0zef]

For someone whose name is Mr Objectivity, that was one of the most biased trash I've ever read.

Lomachenko should not be ranked ahead of Crawford P4P until he beats him? What kind of idiocy is that? Crawford is at LEAST 10 lbs bigger at all times. Right now, they're 17 lbs apart. A much smaller fighter should never NEED to beat a bigger fighter in order to be ranked ahead of them on Pound for Pound list.

And lastly, did you say "beating a bunch of nobodies relative to Crawford"? I love Crawford, he's an awesome fighter. But he's the definition of beating nobodies. His place on P4P is well deserved, but it's because of the eye test, not the resume.

[Madison Boxing]

Who has either actually beat lol? Lomachencko does have a better resume than Crawford and Loma's resume is complete **** for a p4p top fighter.

I agree, lomachenko is overhyped too

[BoxingIsGreat]

This is a bait, troll thread from a poster who specializes in white Eastern Euro fighters! Nothing negative about it. Word for word, he's copying the other guy who was making all these bait threads about some "annihilator, master, god, etc." a few days ago.

I'll bite. This is my top 4:

Usyk
Spence
Crawford
Loma

You are right, tho, Crawford would literally put Loma in a coma, if they fought right now. It'll NEVER happen. Arum and Loma's people are too smart for that.

[BoxingIsGreat]

"Until Loma beats Crowford he should never be ranked ahead of Crowford". What a ridiculous statement!
Now imagine if Joshua beats Parker & Wilders & Fury and become p4p#1 then by your logic Crowford should never be p4p#1 until he beats Joshua!! Isn't your logic flawed??

You don't know what P4P means, bro!
If they were the same size, Crawford would kill Joshua in the ring!