Loma was exposed tonight

[LacedUp]

Lomachenko might be the best fighter I've ever seen.

[TheCell8]

No one is arguing that Rigo landed a ton of shots.

My point is that Lomachenko is open to falling onto some stuff if a fighter near his size brings their boxing brain and minds the defense. All that extra movement, to try and create the opening to land, is where Lomachenko can be landed on.

Loma failed to land cleanly on a great defensive fighter. That's going to happen...

[PsychoPat]

Never seen rigo box like that no pivots, angles maintaining distance not once. Something's fishy said arum will play a part in this the ***in greaseball

[oscar9992]

Loma failed to land cleanly on a great defensive fighter. That's going to happen...

[JJRod]

The idiots of nsb are out in full force.

[RJJ-94-02=GOAT]

😂😂😂😂 quality gif

[Tony Trick-Pony]

😂😂😂😂 quality gif

Thank ya, sir.

I thought so, too.

Game...blouses.

[KillaCamNZ]

Trolls are getting so ****ing lazy these days.

[Mr Objecitivity]

Lomachenko may have missed more shots than he usually does against other opponents. However, he also landed more punches more frequently on Rigondeaux than any of Rigondeaux's past opponents did on him too. All this proves is that both are two of the best boxers in the world pound for pound, defensively and offensively. Just that Lomachenko's offense was a tad bit better (irrespective of size).

So if Lomachenko got exposed for missing as much against Rigondeaux. Then every boxer should be considered as someone 'exposed' since no other boxer did better offensively against Rigondeaux (and / or probably would)?

The bout wasn't even either. Apart from the first round, Lomachenko out landed Rigondeaux in every other round. How can one make a case for Rigondeaux winning those rounds?