is this a double standard? i feel like if lomo wins he's not pound for pound number 1. but if rigo wins he's p4p king.
it's like lomachenko has every single thing in his favor to absolute win to the highest degree (provided mostly by the promotional boxing system) 2 class weight disadvantage, Arums hell bent actions on getting him banned, rigos titles being stripped. the list is endless for the **** to be given to the guy.
if lomo wanted to be p4p1 he should have fought garcia & already king crawford? not a fight that you have most of all of the advantages in? thats why i feel like rigo is p4p number 1 with a win on lomo and lomo is not with a win on rigo.
but great fight none the less.......just had to talk some sense with what we're actually dealing with here.
it's like lomachenko has every single thing in his favor to absolute win to the highest degree (provided mostly by the promotional boxing system) 2 class weight disadvantage, Arums hell bent actions on getting him banned, rigos titles being stripped. the list is endless for the **** to be given to the guy.
if lomo wanted to be p4p1 he should have fought garcia & already king crawford? not a fight that you have most of all of the advantages in? thats why i feel like rigo is p4p number 1 with a win on lomo and lomo is not with a win on rigo.
but great fight none the less.......just had to talk some sense with what we're actually dealing with here.
Comment