Books don't believe in Rigo at all, coefficient for Loma's win is 1,14!

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • oscar9992
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Jul 2013
    • 2888
    • 160
    • 570
    • 16,692

    #1

    Books don't believe in Rigo at all, coefficient for Loma's win is 1,14!

    Books don't believe in Rigo's chances at all.

    They made a coefficient for Loma's win at 1,14 & 5,0 for Rigo's win. Which means if you bet $1k for Loma you will get only $1140, but of you bet 1k on Rigo you will take $5000!

    And those books are not dumb usually.
    Last edited by oscar9992; 12-03-2017, 01:31 PM.
  • pesticid
    Banned
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Aug 2006
    • 7236
    • 456
    • 500
    • 20,597

    #2
    Originally posted by oscar9992
    Books don't believe in Rigo's chances at all.

    They made a coefficient for Loma's win at 1,14 & 5,0 for Rigo's win. Which means if you bet $1k for Loma you will get only $1140, but of you bet on Rigo you will take $5000!

    And those books are not dumb usually.
    The fight is likely going to a decision and it will be very hard for Rigo to get the nod in a competitive fight. Unless he outclasses Loma completely he's not getting win, and even if he does, there is no guarantee. The odds are a little too high though because Rigo is accurate and can crack and Loma comes in squared up.

    Comment

    • boliodogs
      Undisputed Champion
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • May 2008
      • 33358
      • 824
      • 1,782
      • 309,589

      #3
      I think they are both equally great boxers. Loma is naturally about 8 pounds bigger and 8 years younger so I think he will win.

      Comment

      • Redd Foxx
        Hittin' the heavy bag.
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Dec 2011
        • 22007
        • 1,180
        • 2,316
        • 1,257,197

        #4
        Originally posted by boliodogs
        I think they are both equally great boxers. Loma is naturally about 8 pounds bigger and 8 years younger so I think he will win.
        Yea, and as the saying goes; when two fighters are equally skilled, the larger man wins. I think Rigo is even a bit more accurate but styles make fights and Rigos careful punch selection will not fare well vs Loma's high output. To me, it only makes sense that Loma is highly favored. Rigo can win, but he'd have to make major changes and I never bet on a fighter making changes. You always go with what you've seen.

        Comment

        • Sir_Didymus
          Interim Champion
          • Feb 2017
          • 870
          • 65
          • 9
          • 10,398

          #5
          I haven't bet on a fight in a while but if those odds are true I might just put 20 on a Rigo win. Not that I care who wins. I'm neutral.

          I just want to see a highly technical fight. May the best man win.

          Comment

          • g27region
            IKSAB
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Apr 2016
            • 2483
            • 124
            • 172
            • 23,753

            #6
            Talents like Rigo has a chance against anybody.

            Boxing fans think it's going to be some kung fu movie stuff, you know, when two old kung fu masters with grey beards cross their path and they're coming from different provinces of China and represent different schools of kung fu , they start flying around, dodging arrows, throwing fireballs at each other and all that stuff

            Actually, the weight and age of Rigondeaux doesn't worry me that much, I'm more concerned about the fact that Rigondeaux was fighting mediocre opposition since Donaire and had only one round this year.

            Actually, even 3 rounds in 2 years

            But I don't want people to sleep on Rigondeaux, I'd say I feel like it's more risky fight for Lomachenko than Garcia. That being said, I understand that Mikey Garcia win would have a way better value and I don't ask people to give Loma more credit for Rigo than Mikey but I feel like Rigo is more dangerous than anybody, even with all these disadvantages like weight, age and inactivity. He's just THAT good, you can have an argument for Rigondeaux being the best amateur or the best Cuban boxer ever, that's how good he is and even if Loma is more versatile, Rigo is still more polished fighter here
            Last edited by g27region; 12-04-2017, 12:49 AM.

            Comment

            • 'b'
              Delete account. TALMUD
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Nov 2017
              • 7105
              • 402
              • 481
              • 41,914

              #7
              Tempted to put 1k on Loma, but I don't think the odds are that good. If Loma wins, let's hope it's through skill and not size / strength.

              Comment

              • A.K
                Undisputed Champion
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • May 2014
                • 11052
                • 280
                • 79
                • 71,066

                #8
                Loma wins by KO strait up

                Comment

                • !! Shawn
                  !! Shown
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Dec 2007
                  • 9810
                  • 670
                  • 724
                  • 31,455

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Redd Foxx
                  Yea, and as the saying goes; when two fighters are equally skilled, the larger man wins. I think Rigo is even a bit more accurate but styles make fights and Rigos careful punch selection will not fare well vs Loma's high output. To me, it only makes sense that Loma is highly favored. Rigo can win, but he'd have to make major changes and I never bet on a fighter making changes. You always go with what you've seen.
                  Nobody to date has been successful in getting of in volume vs Rigondeaux. His best skill is the ability to slow the pace down as much as he wants too.

                  Lomachenko is going to be fighting a much slower fight than we are use to seeing, which will make it look like he is doing worse than he is regardless of how he is doing.

                  In a slowed down fight, its much closer than 5-1

                  Comment

                  • 'b'
                    Delete account. TALMUD
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Nov 2017
                    • 7105
                    • 402
                    • 481
                    • 41,914

                    #10
                    Originally posted by !! Shawn
                    Nobody to date has been successful in getting of in volume vs Rigondeaux. His best skill is the ability to slow the pace down as much as he wants too.

                    Lomachenko is going to be fighting a much slower fight than we are use to seeing, which will make it look like he is doing worse than he is regardless of how he is doing.

                    In a slowed down fight, its much closer than 5-1
                    Exactly my thoughts. There are levels to this game and Rigo could just be too much of a step-up and might be able to neutralise Loma's path to victory. Whatever the case I don't think either of these guys is gonna steamroll the other unless someone gets caught and hurt early.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP