Comments Thread For: Mayweather Adopts Panda in China, Names it After Himself

[D4thincarnation]

All it takes is one post like this to get on the ignore list!

Stay in your bubble.

Very typical of a SJW.

[D4thincarnation]

you are a fkn idiot

from wiki.....

One the main reasons that panda populations have declined is habitat destruction. As the human population in China continues to grow, pandas' habitat gets taken over by development, pushing them into smaller and less livable areas. Habitat destruction also leads to food shortages.

the breeding issue with panda's is a tiny gestation period

so stop projecting, pencil-****






I - along with most other intelligent adults - deeply regret that...

another difference between you and a normal human being is.... most normal human beings realize that if we allow species to die out then we will die out along with them

also, if we don't care, or are unable to prevent such a tragedy from happening..... then we are clearly doomed to our own incompetence/******ity

the only species that should be encouraged to die out is ****** pac-tard

That is evolution, adapt or die out.
These animals can't breed quickly.
The world won't miss them when they are gone.
They are just a giant waste of money.
And LMAO, from wiki


Stop being such an emotional b!tch. Hundreds of species die out every day, oh wait they don't look all cuddly with big eyes. It's the circle of life, evolution at work, spending all this money to prevent a species from dying out is not only a waste of money but is going against nature.

[jack_the_rippuh]

Better than what a white celebrity/athlete would do.
They would undoubtedly copulate with the animal just to display dominance.

Notice what Kevin Spacey did.

Sick.

[aboutfkntime]

That is evolution, adapt or die out.
These animals can't breed quickly.
The world won't miss them when they are gone.
They are just a giant waste of money.
And LMAO, from wiki


Stop being such an emotional b!tch. Hundreds of species die out every day, oh wait they don't look all cuddly with big eyes. It's the circle of life, evolution at work, spending all this money to prevent a species from dying out is not only a waste of money but is going against nature.

there is only one species I wish would die out

dopey pacstains

or, Dopius Pacstainius, in latin

I can assure you..... if Panda's die out, a lot of people would care

but when you dopey pacstains died out, everybody laughed

so, you are an expert on why species die out huh ?

tell me..... who killed off the Dopius Pacstainius..... was it Marquez, Mayweather, or was it Jeff Horn ?

[Manic Shot]

Floyd can fight a panda on PPV and earn $100 mil.

[D4thincarnation]

there is only one species I wish would die out

dopey pacstains

or, Dopius Pacstainius, in latin

I can assure you..... if Panda's die out, a lot of people would care

but when you dopey pacstains died out, everybody laughed

so, you are an expert on why species die out huh ?

tell me..... who killed off the Dopius Pacstainius..... was it Marquez, Mayweather, or was it Jeff Horn ?

You do have the intelligence of a Panda lover.
Tell me what actual difference does a Panda make to your life?

[D4thincarnation]

Floyd can fight a panda on PPV and earn $100 mil.

Those fanboys love riding his ****.

[aboutfkntime]

You do have the intelligence of a Panda lover.
Tell me what actual difference does a Panda make to your life?

everything is an important part of our ecosystem

how does your life improve by allowing species to die out?

all I am saying is..... if the world erred on the side of caution, rather than erring on the side of "I don't give a fk, because I can't be bothered"..... then the world would be a better place

but hey, just continue burning everything that you don't have a personal use for..... our children/grandchildren may not need too much

one of us has a destructive, small-minded, selfish, viewpoint..... one that will end up destroying everything given time..... and the other suspects that a more sustainable approach would be better for all in the long term

removing about 4 billion useless human beings who are incapable of anything but destruction/consumption, is a far better option than allowing species to die out..... especially when those species are a natural contributing factor in our ecosystem

and I have a great idea where to start

you had better hope that nobody ever allows me to make the rules mutha****a..... you would end up in a cage eating leaves and compost, and a panda would be living in your house

no offense meant, but it comes down to logic

you..... contribute nothing, and could not care less if you leave this world in worse condition than you found it..... whereas members of the animal kingdom, harbor no such thoughts/intentions..... and will only contribute to the cycle of life

I know who I prefer sharing this world with

Panda's also know more about boxing than you do..... they knew Pac had no chance with Mayweather

[D4thincarnation]

everything is an important part of our ecosystem

how does your life improve by allowing species to die out?

all I am saying is..... if the world erred on the side of caution, rather than erring on the side of "I don't give a fk, because I can't be bothered"..... then the world would be a better place

but hey, just continue burning everything that you don't have a personal use for..... our children/grandchildren may not need too much

one of us has a destructive, small-minded, selfish, viewpoint..... one that will end up destroying everything given time..... and the other suspects that a more sustainable approach would be better for all in the long term

removing about 4 billion useless human beings who are incapable of anything but destruction/consumption, is a far better option than allowing species to die out..... especially when those species are a natural contributing factor in our ecosystem

and I have a great idea where to start

you had better hope that nobody ever allows me to make the rules mutha****a..... you would end up in a cage eating leaves and compost, and a panda would be living in your house

no offense meant, but it comes down to logic

you..... contribute nothing, and could not care less if you leave this world in worse condition than you found it..... whereas members of the animal kingdom, harbor no such thoughts/intentions..... and will only contribute to the cycle of life

I know who I prefer sharing this world with

Panda's also know more about boxing than you do..... they knew Pac had no chance with Mayweather

1) So you don't know what an ecosystem is then

2) Waste of money trying to save them.

3)You clearly no nothing, just bought into the hype and probably thinks Panda's are cute.

[aboutfkntime]

1) So you don't know what an ecosystem is then

2) Waste of money trying to save them.

3)You clearly no nothing, just bought into the hype and probably thinks Panda's are cute.

1) every living thing is a member of our global ecosystem

you get the point, so why quibble over words ?

2) I completely disagree

it is a waste of money feeding human beings who contribute nothing, have no regard for the planet/environment, and who are content with leaving the world in a worse condition than they found it

3) you..... contribute nothing, and could not care less if you leave this world in worse condition than you found it..... whereas members of the animal kingdom, harbor no such thoughts/intentions..... and will only contribute to the cycle of life

even birds don't **** in their own nest, like you intend to

I know who I prefer sharing the planet with

we can agree to disagree

peace