Comments Thread For: Golden Boy Prez: Cotto Had Asked Us To Get Golovkin

[daggum]

ali is just a better fighter than ggg and now has a bette resume. canelo vs ali in may 2018. super fight

[aboutfkntime]

Just to clear things up for you: If Cotto said to Golovkin, "Look, I'll fight you for $$XX @ XX Lbs" That's an offer. To tell a reporter that he will only fight all future fights for his then MW belt @ a CW is a condition, not an offer.

a condition that the B-side Golovkin REFUSED

refuse
rɪˈfjuːz/Submit
verb
indicate or show that one is not willing to do something

Golovkin then happily offered to fight JMW's at 154

just not Cotto or Canelo

then. you came along and blamed the PROVEN warrior

get help

[TonyGe]

a condition that the B-side Golovkin REFUSED

refuse
rɪˈfjuːz/Submit
verb
indicate or show that one is not willing to do something

Golovkin then happily offered to fight JMW's at 154

just not Cotto or Canelo

then. you came along and blamed the PROVEN warrior

get help

The reason Cotto and Canelo didn't fight G is they were afraid to lose. It would have completely screwed up the Canelo Cotto fight if one of the guys had lost to Golovkin. That's why Cotto paid G to step aside. Then Canelo ducked Golovkin and gave up his title rather than fight him. The Proven Warrior wanted to part of Golovkin.

[aboutfkntime]

The reason Cotto and Canelo didn't fight G is they were afraid to lose.

it is EXACTLY the opposite

trust you to be 100% WRONG lol

FACT: Golovkin ran around for FIVE YEARS saying that he will fight " anyone from 154-168 ".....

FACT: even AFTER refusing Cotto, Golovkin stated that he is willing and able to fight at 154..... but nobody will step up

he was willing to fight at 154 BEFORE 2015, and he was willing to fight at 154 AFTER 2015..... just not against Cotto/Canelo

FACT: Canelo would have beaten Golovkin at 155..... and Cotto would have given him hell, if not beaten him at 155..... for no other reason than the weight

so yea, you are completely wrong..... again

the fact that is so easy for you to throw two PROVEN warriors under a bus..... while completely ignoring Golovkin's lies and bullshht..... is disturbing

oh, and Hypekin was more than happy to offer Brook/Rosado catchweights

you clowns need help

[TonyGe]

it is EXACTLY the opposite

trust you to be 100% WRONG lol

FACT: Golovkin ran around for FIVE YEARS saying that he will fight " anyone from 154-168 ".....

FACT: even AFTER refusing Cotto, Golovkin stated that he is willing and able to fight at 154..... but nobody will step up

he was willing to fight at 154 BEFORE 2015, and he was willing to fight at 154 AFTER 2015..... just not against Cotto/Canelo

FACT: Canelo would have beaten Golovkin at 155..... and Cotto would have given him hell, if not beaten him at 155..... for no other reason than the weight

so yea, you are completely wrong..... again

the fact that is so easy for you to throw two PROVEN warriors under a bus..... while completely ignoring Golovkin's lies and bullshht..... is disturbing

oh, and Hypekin was more than happy to offer Brook/Rosado catchweights

you clowns need help

You mean two fighters that are proven to fight at Catchweights. Canelo proved something to me that he's better than I thought. Cotto never impressed me.

[aboutfkntime]

You mean two fighters that are proven to fight at Catchweights. Canelo proved something to me that he's better than I thought. Cotto never impressed me.

if Golovkin impresses you more than Cotto does..... then you wouldn't know a good fighter if he punched you in the face

Cotto > Golovkin

you admitted that you were wrong about Canelo..... but whether you know it or not, you are also wrong about Cotto

[TonyGe]

if Golovkin impresses you more than Cotto does..... then you wouldn't know a good fighter if he punched you in the face

Cotto > Golovkin

you admitted that you were wrong about Canelo..... but whether you know it or not, you are also wrong about Cotto

No I wasn't wrong about Canelo I knew he couldn't beat Golovkin. He was better than I thought. I thought be would get knocked out. He clearly lost but he did manage to last to the end. Again Canello has never impressed me. As far as getting punched in the face I'll pass on that.. But if that's your thing by all means.

[aboutfkntime]

No I wasn't wrong about Canelo I knew he couldn't beat Golovkin. He was better than I thought. I thought be would get knocked out. He clearly lost but he did manage to last to the end. Again Canello has never impressed me. As far as getting punched in the face I'll pass on that.. But if that's your thing by all means.

..... and, you were WRONG

if you have never been impressed by Canelo, nor Cotto..... and yet you are impressed by Golovkin..... then I don't know what to say

actually, I will say it..... Cotto/Canelo BOTH > Golovkin..... BOTH are better fighters, stylistically and historically..... NO question

if you have never been impressed with Cotto/Canelo..... then you are a fanboy, NOT a boxing fan..... because BOTH are better than Golovkin

watch how it's done.....

I do not like Golovkin at all..... he is a protected network darling, who has failed to live up to his OWN hype..... but is he a helluva fighter?..... you bet, absolutely

see, not hard

[TonyGe]

..... and, you were WRONG

if you have never been impressed by Canelo, nor Cotto..... and yet you are impressed by Golovkin..... then I don't know what to say

actually, I will say it..... Cotto/Canelo BOTH > Golovkin..... BOTH are better fighters, stylistically and historically..... NO question

if you have never been impressed with Cotto/Canelo..... then you are a fanboy, NOT a boxing fan..... because BOTH are better than Golovkin

watch how it's done.....

I do not like Golovkin at all..... he is a protected network darling, who has failed to live up to his OWN hype..... but is he a helluva fighter?..... you bet, absolutely

see, not hard

Its obvious your biased against Golovkin. Its your choice. That's fine.. For a guy that's all media hype he's doing pretty damned well. Is there hype? Probably. Has he lived up to it? Yes in my opinion. People were looking for a hard punching come forward fighter. Golovkin delivered that. So what is so hard to understand. He can't control what others say about him. He can't control the media if they want to praise him. He can't control his detractors if they want to criticize him. All he can do is get in the ring and deliver entertaining fights. He does that. His boxing skills are very underrated, he has a great chin, better than average defense and lives a clean life. If you want to go and find fault, go for it. Someone looking as hard as you do for a crack in his armor will find something. Congratulations on being relentlessly negative.

[aboutfkntime]

Its obvious your biased against Golovkin.....

you just said that Cotto/Canelo have never impressed you

I said that Golovkin is a helluva fighter

are... you... absolutely sure you are qualified to judge ?

..... Its your choice. That's fine.. For a guy that's all media hype he's doing pretty damned well. Is there hype? Probably. Has he lived up to it? Yes in my opinion. People were looking for a hard punching come forward fighter. Golovkin delivered that.....

hold on man.....

Golovkin ran around for FIVE YEARS saying that he could beat "anyone from 154-168", and you idiots have been heard comparing him to Hagler/Monzon.....

the fact is..... Golovkin killed three HUGE fights over weight, and he barely sc****d past Canelo..... truth be known, he likely LOST to Danny Jacobs

so that 154-168 myth is well and truly BUSTED, as are the Hagler/Monzon comparisons

not only has he fallen way short of what was promised, Golovkin seems reluctant to test himself and will only take fights on his terms

I think he understands the business/hype/marketing aspect of boxing very well indeed, as well as the risk/reward aspect

..... So what is so hard to understand. He can't control what others say about him. He can't control the media if they want to praise him. He can't control his detractors if they want to criticize him. All he can do is get in the ring and deliver entertaining fights. He does that. His boxing skills are very underrated, he has a great chin, better than average defense and lives a clean life. If you want to go and find fault, go for it. Someone looking as hard as you do for a crack in his armor will find something. Congratulations on being relentlessly negative.

cut your bullshht

Golovkin has done a masterful job controlling the media

he made the following statement AFTER refusing to negotiate on weight with Cotto/Canelo..... neither the inept fawning media - nor any of you clowns - called him out on his bullshht.....





and don't reply saying..... "Golovkin never said that personally"..... because you and I have already been there.....

aside from being 100% responsible/accountable for his OFFICIAL representatives..... Golovkin has clearly played along with it, and he has clearly played it up..... also, he said all that damn shht himself, dating back to 2012

I got links, as you know..... just ask, again

YOU ran with that hype and bullshht, even if you had to throw BETTER fighters under a bus to pull it off

#collateraldamage
#fansnotfanboys