Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

If Rigo wins...Loma is exposed...If Loma Wins Rigo is Exposed...

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • If Rigo wins...Loma is exposed...If Loma Wins Rigo is Exposed...

    This question is only for those with a BRAIN... if you lack the comprehension level of at least a Jr High kid please stop reading here...otherwise...carry on...

    If Rigo wins...Loma is exposed...If Loma Wins Rigo is Exposed...

    In these fickle times in boxing of "today you are the second coming, tomorrow you are and always were a bum" ...tell me why the above statements are true...

    cuz you know they are coming one way or another after the fight...


    wachugot???

































    Ok go.............

  • #2
    If Loma wins, they will say Rigo was too small.

    People will also not give Rigo credit if he beats Loma. They will say Salido already exposed him.

    That's how it goes these days. The losing fighter gets exposed and the winner gets no credit. That's why most fighters don't fight for glory anymore and it's strictly business.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by TheBigLug View Post
      If Loma wins, they will say Rigo was too small.

      People will also not give Rigo credit if he beats Loma. They will say Salido already exposed him.

      That's how it goes these days. The losing fighter gets exposed and the winner gets no credit. That's why most fighters don't fight for glory anymore and it's strictly business.
      Salido didn’t expose anything. That was only Lomachenko’s second professional fight, and “Siri” took advantage by fighting dirty. Even so, the decision was debatable.

      I agree that dumbasses will always find something to harp about, but it’s tough to give Vasyl full credit for beating a smaller man who’s arguably past his prime.

      Comment


      • #4
        in boxing years rigo is ancient #justsaying

        Comment


        • #5
          I don't see how Rigo moving up 2 divisions and losing to a P4P fighter would expose him.

          Comment


          • #6
            How about both are not exposed and the better man won. No wonder boxers rarely go all out like the UFC. A loss in boxing is the end of the world for its fat armchair experts.

            Comment


            • #7
              If they're two of the best fighters out there today then I don't see how anyone can call the loser exposed.

              On the other hand, if either fighter get blasted out in 1 or 2 rounds you would have to take that into consideration. The size difference won't even make a difference if that's the case.

              Comment


              • #8
                10lbs+ in ring weight difference is huge at the lower weights. No point trying to say it doesn't make any difference, when anyone with half a brain knows it does.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Stop with this exposed bull**** already

                  If you knew anything about boxing you'd already know that they are both great fighters

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by iamboxing View Post
                    How about both are not exposed and the better man won. No wonder boxers rarely go all out like the UFC. A loss in boxing is the end of the world for its fat armchair experts.
                    Thank you!

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP