Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Joshua: Fury Boxed and Ran With Klitschko - I Don't Respect That!

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    The great Ric Flair had a saying: "To be the man you have to beat the man."

    And that's exactly what Tyson Fury did.

    Joshua can't call himself the man in the heavyweight division until he goes and sees Mr. Fury. Beating Tyson's leftovers isn't going to cut it.

    Comment


    • #22
      Originally posted by MeiXiang View Post
      So basically, Anthony Joshua is a hater on the Sweet Science of hitting and not being hit. I respect Joshua for what he's done and he's an incredible boxer but he's getting on my nerves these past few months - he used to be quite humble but his head is getting big. I don't like it.

      /facepalm

      Fury > Joshua anyday
      Yeah...I know what you mean mate. The 'AJ' show is unravelling a bit and people are starting to see through it.

      It wasn't long ago that Joshua was saying that he wanted to show the world his skills, his feints, his slips and his moves. Then he comes out and says that Fury's skills, feints, slips and moves are 'running'.

      Joshua couldn't do anything like what Fury did and it pains him.

      Comment


      • #23
        Originally posted by ShoulderRoll View Post
        The great Ric Flair had a saying: "To be the man you have to beat the man."

        And that's exactly what Tyson Fury did.

        Joshua can't call himself the man in the heavyweight division until he goes and sees Mr. Fury. Beating Tyson's leftovers isn't going to cut it.
        "You gotta walk that aisle. Cause whether you like it, or you don't like it, learn to love it, because it's the best thing going today.... WHOOO!"

        Comment


        • #24
          Originally posted by Guy3008 View Post
          Joshua is far more entertaining. You can't argue with that. You can watch Joshua and Klistchko again and again but Fury-Klitschko? Nah, I never watched it more than once.
          Depends what you like really, Fury v Wlad was a subtle schooling and if you appreciate the small, subtle skills and the art of boxing and moving then you would enjoy it.

          If you're after Gatti v Ward action then no, probably not.

          AJ - Wlad has been made out like an all time great but it wasn't really THAT good. There was 3 very good rounds. The rest of the fight was pretty dull.

          Comment


          • #25
            Originally posted by lefthooklead View Post
            Yeah...I know what you mean mate. The 'AJ' show is unravelling a bit and people are starting to see through it.

            It wasn't long ago that Joshua was saying that he wanted to show the world his skills, his feints, his slips and his moves. Then he comes out and says that Fury's skills, feints, slips and moves are 'running'.

            Joshua couldn't do anything like what Fury did and it pains him.
            AJ is trying to convince himself that he fought the man and beat the man. this is the lie that he, his team and the delusional fans are trying to perpetuate. But the truth remains the truth, i.e., he beat a man that was beaten by the man (Fury). That's the main reason why he took the fight anyway.

            He hates on Fury but says it is the other way. This is part of the problem in the world. People spin stuff to create a perception and make it seem like the truth. Either way, if AJ mans up to fight either Wilder or Fury, he gets exposed and destroyed. I am very certain Wilder will destroy him and Fury will play with him.

            Comment


            • #26
              Joshua said this?? Hahaha bruh sound like a casual.

              Comment


              • #27
                Originally posted by lefthooklead View Post
                Depends what you like really, Fury v Wlad was a subtle schooling and if you appreciate the small, subtle skills and the art of boxing and moving then you would enjoy it.

                If you're after Gatti v Ward action then no, probably not.

                AJ - Wlad has been made out like an all time great but it wasn't really THAT good. There was 3 very good rounds. The rest of the fight was pretty dull.
                Well said.

                Comment


                • #28
                  Originally posted by lefthooklead View Post
                  Depends what you like really, Fury v Wlad was a subtle schooling and if you appreciate the small, subtle skills and the art of boxing and moving then you would enjoy it.

                  If you're after Gatti v Ward action then no, probably not.

                  AJ - Wlad has been made out like an all time great but it wasn't really THAT good. There was 3 very good rounds. The rest of the fight was pretty dull.
                  It wasn't dull when you watched it live and you can't expect every round to have the same action level as those 3 rounds.These are heavyweights.

                  Wlad was mentally frozen against Fury and Fury was too scared to exchange. He is much more entertaining outside the ring.

                  At least with Joshua you get what you paid for.

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    At least he didn’t get dropped like you, no chin, body builder/peds?, gased out, over hyped, fighting bums fraud champ.

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      I agree, they are over hyping that fight, it’s starting to get ridiculous, a young fighter against a grandfather, where grand pop dropped his grandson, if Wilder dropped this fraud brit, he would of never got back up or made it through the rest of the fight

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP