Should Vasyl Lomachenko consider retirement if he loses to Guillermo Rigondeaux?

[Mr Objecitivity]

What do you readers think? If Lomachenko loses, would he still remain relevant as an elite boxer? Would his other accomplishments be valued after losing to Rigondeaux? Other than money, would he benefit much from continuing boxing?

[g27region]

Seems like a lot of NSB posters would be happy with this decision

[NEETzsche]

I guess everyone should retire since no one on NSB seems to enjoy boxing anyway

[papichulosweg]

Lol this question so should every boxer retired after loosing once?

[Robbie Barrett]

Lol this question so should every boxer retired after loosing once?

Losing to Rigo would be losing twice for Loma.

[LetOutTheCage]

No of course he shouldn't, Rigo is an elite fighter and I would say the same thing if Rigo gets beat.

[j.razor]

espn would still have him at #1 P4P....lol

[Lopez_Boxing]

I guess everyone should retire since no one on NSB seems to enjoy boxing anyway

THANK YOU^^^^^^^It’s like this is the “why boxing sucks” site. Maybe a Sister company of sherdog.

[Ray*]

Nope, hopefully tank Davis wouldn't be in prison anytime soon. They could do that fight. He should be ready by then.

[Lopez_Boxing]

What do you readers think? If Lomachenko loses, would he still remain relevant as an elite boxer? Would his other accomplishments be valued after losing to Rigondeaux? Other than money, would he benefit much from continuing boxing?

Pacquiao didn’t after Horn.....and money is the ONLY benefit. Have you seen any boxers when they are out of the game. Mind and body has been affected