Well, thank God they are both knockout specialists. After the debacle that was the "result" of GGG v Canelo, the LAST thing any decent fighter wants to chance is a "Vegas decision." It's like rolling the dice at the craps table.
And, it's all together missing the point. A fight like this DESERVES to be a spectacle - nothing says "spectacle" so much as a massive stadium filled to the brim with folks looking for the once-in-a-lifetime experience of being able to say "I was there." Why would the fight being held in Wembley do much less PPV business in America than it does if held in Vegas? Granted, there are time differences - but AJ v Klitschko sold around 700k via Showtime, for live broadcast and almost the same with HBO for the delayed showing - and not an American fighter in sight. That's excluding the record-breaking business it did on SKY and the 10.4 million (TEN POINT FOUR) people who bought the fight in Germany (Klitschko factor, admittedly.)
Wilder has been champion longer, yes - but what other options does he have, other than AJ? AJ has several lucrative options even BEFORE he has to face Wilder and, as a 20-fight greenhorn, he couldn't be blamed if he wanted to maximize the value of his brand before tackling Wilder. I'm not saying that will happen, or even that it's what he wants to do...I am simply pointing out that there are huge fights AJ could still make with, or without, Wilder. I still think the fight will happen in Summer and, since Wilder's team seems to be calling for Eddie Hearn to make all the running (what does Lou diBella ACTUALLY do?), then, it is logical to suggest that England is the most likely destination for the fight.
Comment