Takam better doe

[HarvardBlue]

Takam would have the same success against Wilder as he did against Joshua. Wilder would probably use his jab more but Takam is very durable and can box.

[DuckAdonis]

Takam is better than stiverne rn but i dont expect Takam to go that many rounds with Deontay as he did with AJ

[Raggamuffin]

How long would Takam have lasted against Wilder? Would Takam have been standing in the 10th?

How long would Stiverne have lasted with AJ? Would Joshua been able to dispatch Bermaine in the 1st?

Takam's head might've landed in the 4th row. That type of style doesn't bode well against Wilder. It did him good against AJ because AJ doesn't have technique when you box him. AJ knows how to throw punches, but not when a guy is using defense. He's ordinary. Wilder will club you with straight and wide punches. He can adapt to a fighters style, Joshua can't.

[Raggamuffin]

What makes Takam beter than Stiverne when Stiverne has beaten better comp and won the WBC title? Keyword: Beaten

[Robbie Barrett]

Takam would do a lot better against Wilder than he did Joshua. Takam would see a lot more openings with Wilders wild swings than he did against Joshua.

[Guest]

How long would Takam have lasted against Wilder? Would Takam have been standing in the 10th?

How long would Stiverne have lasted with AJ? Would Joshua been able to dispatch Bermaine in the 1st?

I appreciate that 90% of all boxing discussion in NSB is based around triangular logic (the other 10% based around who's the "biggest hater" who "knows nuthen bout boxing") but why do you need to use this triangular logic when both men have already fought a common opponent?

Eric Molina.

How did that comparison look for Wilder?

[redmish]

Who is better Kubrat Pulev or Dominic Breazeale?

^^ Those are the next fight for each champion

Pulev is better than brezeale in my opinion. He was an excellent amateur and has only lost to klitschko. I would say that brezeale has the better chin of the two though.

[GGG Gloveking]

I appreciate that 90% of all boxing discussion in NSB is based around triangular logic (the other 10% based around who's the "biggest hater" who "knows nuthen bout boxing") but why do you need to use this triangular logic when both men have already fought a common opponent?

Eric Molina.

How did that comparison look for Wilder?

So basically you're saying you'd rather use different triangular logic, because the triangular logic I'm using doesn't look as good for your boy.

Got it

[GGG Gloveking]

Takam's head might've landed in the 4th row. That type of style doesn't bode well against Wilder. It did him good against AJ because AJ doesn't have technique when you box him. AJ knows how to throw punches, but not when a guy is using defense. He's ordinary. Wilder will club you with straight and wide punches. He can adapt to a fighters style, Joshua can't.

Good thing Bermaine had that 10lbs of braids securing his head down or his sh it would have landed in someone's lap, lol. And I agree with Wilder being able to adapt better. He seems like a more natural fighter, whereas Joshua seems like a more textbook boxer.

[Lester Tutor]

Wilder came to make a bold statement in the remarch. Stiverne has only been stopped by Wilder. The King bout was a joke, horrid stoppage by the ref. Plus Wilder faced Stiverne's leftovers in Arreola, an Arreola that was hit hard with Bermaine's hard overhand.

Takam was KO'd twice. I'd say Stiverne has a better chin than Takam.