Comments Thread For: Wilder To Anthony Joshua: No More Dodging, No More Excuses

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • DoomOnHorseback
    Up and Comer
    Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
    • Nov 2017
    • 47
    • 1
    • 29
    • 6,405

    #21
    Relax guys. Nobody from either camp are ducking anyone. They both want it. It'll happen on Hearn's terms though.
    AJ will fight 3 times next year as pointed out. If Hearn has his way, Wilder will be the last of them. Makes sense from a business point of view. Wilder is now publicly knocking on the door and getting column inches in the UK. It'll build up nicely late for late next year.
    You can understand Hearn wanting Wilder to fight Whyte first as he's in his stable. Why not as well?
    Fight Whyte in the UK and I'm sure a Vegas bout can be made in Nov '18. Wilder mentioned about the contract not stipulating that he gets AJ after. Why would it? If he loses, who would want to see him fight AJ? If he wins, fans from both sides of the pond would demand it. So it's win or bust. I'm sure he's more than capable of putting Whyte away in his own back yard. That would give him some leverage in wage negotiations as well.

    Comment

    • Butch.McRae
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Dec 2015
      • 4187
      • 153
      • 80
      • 22,548

      #22
      Originally posted by DoomOnHorseback
      Relax guys. Nobody from either camp are ducking anyone. They both want it. It'll happen on Hearn's terms though.
      AJ will fight 3 times next year as pointed out. If Hearn has his way, Wilder will be the last of them. Makes sense from a business point of view. Wilder is now publicly knocking on the door and getting column inches in the UK. It'll build up nicely late for late next year.
      You can understand Hearn wanting Wilder to fight Whyte first as he's in his stable. Why not as well?
      Fight Whyte in the UK and I'm sure a Vegas bout can be made in Nov '18. Wilder mentioned about the contract not stipulating that he gets AJ after. Why would it? If he loses, who would want to see him fight AJ? If he wins, fans from both sides of the pond would demand it. So it's win or bust. I'm sure he's more than capable of putting Whyte away in his own back yard. That would give him some leverage in wage negotiations as well.
      Whyte is trash and it's insulting to suggest Wilder should have to fight him. Why not offer up Haye after he beats Bellew? *As long as he doesn't get hurt.

      If Joshua wants to fight Parker, give Wilder a Haye scrap in the UK. That would earn some nice coin for Matchroom and make much more sense. This Whyte talk is complete nonsense imo.

      Comment

      • sotgoda
        Interim Champion
        Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
        • Oct 2017
        • 569
        • 32
        • 9
        • 6,858

        #23
        Originally posted by P4Pdunny
        takam was his mando???? dont come at me with excuses i dont give a damn about aj or wilder personally why would i make excuses for any of em?
        Are you even reading my post correctly. Takam began the IBF mandatory once Pulev pulled out. the only other remaining mandatory was the for the WBA, i.e., Luiz Ortiz who was removed. So, AJ does not have mandatory. that's all I am saying.

        Comment

        • P4Pdunny
          Undisputed Champion
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Jul 2017
          • 8097
          • 144
          • 142
          • 58,715

          #24
          Originally posted by Fabes88
          No sorry mate common sense and logic doesn't work in this case. Joshua was supposed to fight wilder right after klitchko despite it being common knowledge he had an ibf and wba Mando due after with no exception for unifications.
          lol im at a loss reading what some of his fans say on here to big him up and discredit josh

          Comment

          Working...
          TOP