You tell that scared ass UK fighter to fight
Collapse
-
-
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Not sure why people can't be objective beyond their fandom for certain fighters. For the record I believe Wilder beats Joshua by knock out but it is beyond me how anyone can even remotely defend Wilder's resume, although he deserves credit for stepping up to Povetkin and Ortiz but for obvious reasons those fights not occur.
Joshua has already beaten a game Wladmir in his young career and handled the likes of Martin and Brezeale guys who I don't really rate to be fair. But deserves credit for the Whyte victory as well, he's another name worth mentioning. Wilder's best win to date was against Artur Szpilka for me, but that doesn't compare to a victory over Wlad and we're talking about a man who has been the world champion for a while now but has not hunted the big names until now. There's a reason for that, Joshua is an easier fight then Wlad would have been.
And now there's criticism being directed at Joshua for not facing Wilder, are you guys kidding me? he stepped up to face Wladmir Klitchko, there's more reason to poise this question at Wilder given his resume. But from what I gauge both are very keen on doing battle, both will be paid extremely well and both will get a shot at unifying the titles. So this point scoring is extremely childish from Wilder and Joshua fans. The fight will happen in 2018 or 2019 at the very latest, there's no doubt about that and I can't wait because I will be there at Wembley, cheering my guy Wilder on even though am a Brit.Comment
-
Not sure why people can't be objective beyond their fandom for certain fighters. For the record I believe Wilder beats Joshua by knock out but it is beyond me how anyone can even remotely defend Wilder's resume, although he deserves credit for stepping up to Povetkin and Ortiz but for obvious reasons those fights not occur.
Joshua has already beaten a game Wladmir in his young career and handled the likes of Martin and Brezeale guys who I don't really rate to be fair. But deserves credit for the Whyte victory as well, he's another name worth mentioning. Wilder's best win to date was against Artur Szpilka for me, but that doesn't compare to a victory over Wlad and we're talking about a man who has been the world champion for a while now but has not hunted the big names until now. There's a reason for that, Joshua is an easier fight then Wlad would have been.
And now there's criticism being directed at Joshua for not facing Wilder, are you guys kidding me? he stepped up to face Wladmir Klitchko, there's more reason to poise this question at Wilder given his resume. But from what I gauge both are very keen on doing battle, both will be paid extremely well and both will get a shot at unifying the titles. So this point scoring is extremely childish from Wilder and Joshua fans. The fight will happen in 2018 or 2019 at the very latest, there's no doubt about that and I can't wait because I will be there at Wembley, cheering my guy Wilder on even though am a Brit.
If Wilder beats him, that mystique is gone. AJ will still make good money but not as much and will not have the reputation he is trying to hold on to as the baddest man which he isn't. Further, Tyson Fury is the man who beat the man legitimately, not a man who beat a man coming from a loss. Just saying...Comment
-
-
Good point made here, but how can we conclude he beat a game Wlad? Wlad's effort was there but even he cannot overcome the huge age difference. Also, AJ went the Wlad route because it was mid-risk, high reward for him. AJ did not want to go the Wilder route, because it was high-risk, mid-reward for him. AJ, in my opinion, is not as keen as Wilder to fight the latter. This is because his team is telling him that Wilder could potentially limit AJ's earning potential if AJ gets knocked out and destroy AJ's mystique. Part of why AJ is popular is because of the wins, i.e., the Olympics, undefeated, looks the part, perfect knockout ratio, etc.
If Wilder beats him, that mystique is gone. AJ will still make good money but not as much and will not have the reputation he is trying to hold on to as the baddest man which he isn't. Further, Tyson Fury is the man who beat the man legitimately, not a man who beat a man coming from a loss. Just saying...Comment
Comment